Jump to content

Pink Lemonade

Members
  • Posts

    120
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pink Lemonade

  1. Custom games have become a big part of halo now, for some people that's all they play. The only problem with custom games is that it's hard to start up large games. A solution, Add in a sever browser!!!! with a sever browser it would be so much easier to start costume games up.
  2. Actually this might be good proof
  3. We have to get things straight here, SPRINT is a MECHANIC and new mechanics are never a necessity to any game. Just because new games are successful with a certain mechanic that doesn't mean every new game will be successful with that mechanic. Look at what sprinting did to rainbow six vegas two, that game was awful compared to the first one. Sprinting in reach has proven to me that its a bad mechanic for halo. I think a lot of people who want sprint in halo are very aggressive players who have no patience and chose not to use their heads in game. It's always better for a competitive game to have predictable game play, that makes it more balanced and less random and game plans are also much more effective. Sprinting isn't a part of the evolution of gameplay, theres no such thing.
  4. how would you know? have you conducted cruel experiments on people, like capturing 50 children and forcing them to play reach and then CE and then asking them which one is better? Im pretty sure you havn't but i could be wrong.
  5. lol 117 is master chiefs serial number, i just noticed that.
  6. but that still doenst make the mechanics seem better to them though, because if they havn't played any of the originals so they could not of compared the two.
  7. But CE shared the same core gameplay settings as halo 3(besides the equipment)
  8. Reach, because its newer of course. But that doesnt make better because of the gameplay, newbs who just start playing halo don't understand anything other than the pretty textures in the game.
  9. Technology has nothing to do with better gameplay, other than more AI's and Scenery in one area with further rendering. Reach must be a poor example of games getting better from drastic changes if i see so many people wanting gameplay from halo 3 back.
  10. CoD is just as unrealistic as halo, tell your friends they know nothing of the brutal reality of combat. If anyone wants realism in a game don't stick with console, play Red Orchestra or ArmA II on PC.
  11. looking good so far, thanks for the sum
  12. i just figured, since they weigh half a ton(in armor) and can lift 3 times their weight. That was in the Fall of Reach
  13. if can chose where the emblem is located, i guarantee that 4 out 10 players will have it in the groin area lol
  14. with the thruster packs, i think those will be pickup. So long as loadout are not added into competitive matchmaking im fine with the game having that kind of stuff.
  15. That was a very ignorant rant, first of all that "10 year old game that cant possibly be good" is what started the series and is still loved by many people. It didn't just start the halo series it's engine was taken and modified by many developers, so you can say halo CE is the father of todays console FPS's. I cant believe you actually dissed halo CE! why do you think they remade the game? well because it the best console FPS for it's time of all time! The only reason you dont want this to turn into a big argument is because you know you will lose. Most of the people who have played halo 1,2 and 3 hate armor abilities, Face it AA's suck and 343 doens't even like them. I agree everone has there opinions but it's a straight fact that AA's dont even compare to amount of skill it took to play halo 3(the right way). O ya and "no one cares if it isn't like original halo" is also a very ignorant thing to say since the op is about bringing halo back the way it was.
  16. neither, Spartans can throw 2000 pound boulders at you, it only makes since for them to have no problem with firing a weapon(plus it's 500 year in the future). But recoil if anything, bloom only slowed the pace of the game and brought a great deal of luck in the game.
  17. Well that is very bad idea...... if you force casuals to play competitively a lot of people are going to hate this game. If you have ever seen real competitive halo you will know that im not joking when i say its one of the most hardcore gaming experiences ever. Competitive halo is intense and a lot of people dont want to get into that, they will get cussed out for not even knowing the call outs. There needs to be playlists you dont have to try in, if not the matchmaking will be unplayable for many people.
  18. I dont like the idea of credits effecting the ranking system, it never did in the first place. The ranking should't go away either, in halo 3 i always had something to work for since the system was always there were i left off, and it was so hard that it took a really long time for me to get my high 40's in every playlist. Winning is the only thing that should rank you because a simple goal makes the game much more intensely competitive. If you get a good pos KD you should rank down in slayer games, since it wasnt your fault for the loss. The more simple the system the better, Otherwise halo 2 ranking all the way.
  19. The chief will find a butt buddy some how.......... maybe a unicorn... and then it will evolve into a quadricorn!!!!!!
  20. ya, but that doenst take a plan to do, it just happens.
  21. as long as the BR feels the same i could care less how it looks.
  22. thanks for the info i must been listening to people who didn't know what they were talking about. I was frowning on that idea, and hoping that it wasnt true.
  23. O ya! now i remember! but the quote was still used in the ghosts of onyx a few times.
×
×
  • Create New...