Victory Element

this makes sense now....

0this could be possible. If fans react well to FUD, then it may bring about a movie of some sorts. Personally, i would like a movie based on ODSTs rather than MC. two reasons 1)the games are for MC's story 2) ODSTs are involved in the most intense combat there is in the halo universe

probably watch it just someplace on youtube becuase its easy to get to. Or i may just wait because it will come with my LE

i have never seen this armor before. A pic would be nice

most replies say it is possible to do any combos, but i'm not so sure. let me use some reach armor as an example: how could an armor skin fit on a spartan with EVA helmet, grenadier chest, one ODST shoulder, and a sniper shoulder?? it just doesnt make sense

it is called the mamoth. Its probably going to replace the elephant in halo 4 but we dont know much about it

it would help a lot if you were in a vehicle like a warthog, but it wouldnt work well with some others. Take the falcon as an example. The gunner cant just hop into cockpit while the vehicle is in free fall........ it would be pretty BA, but it just wont happen

i'm sure its still yellow as well. Just because the guys we are fighting have a new name doesnt mean that they didnt originate from the covenant. The dark color with neon blue would be to much of change from the covenant weapons that we know, i dont like it either. and the rifle is probably just an edit of the light rifle as Mayh3m said above

i think it looks very cool. But the name does not fit the appearance at all. I would go with a name like the "mantis" or "black widow". it looks somewhat like a giant bug to me

if they can carry a giant fuel rod gun........they can wield the hammer

i dont follow or watch that much football on TV and stuff. But i do play football and go to varsity games at my highschool

nice job

they love to spam because they think its funny making other people mad....... and bad things happen when you make people mad

Indeed he is sternuS. but i have a feeling more will be revealed in halo 4. Frank O'connor said in an interview that the flood wouldnt be an enemy in the game, but they will have role in the story. Or he may just be hinting the legendary ending, which i hope has to do with the flood

thats is a good point, most people wouldnt use it much, but i think i would occassionally. I like beating the campaign with the claasic run and gun style, but then i go back and try to make everything seem all tactical. I just think its fun. But with or without the commands, the AI could be improved a lot

we can still have great hog seen though!! i still get goosebumps with heroic music playing when i'm cruising in my worthog

they have weapons for sure, but they are not equiped for a war

most probably were, but i havent posted on this topic for so long and i forget what we were talking about

if you read the caption below the pic, it says its a native human boy

i dont see how any can say its not the didact...... it literally shows the didact's symbol and says "an ancient evil awakens"

is it possible the Didact was put in the cryptum as a sort of punishment for some actions that he may have done?? In Silentium, both the original didact and the obrnstellar didact are characters, so we dont even know which one is in the cryptum..... but i have an idea... we have all seen concept art pictures of giant foerunner structures, and in a certain one, forerunner looking ships are seen flying aorund these structures no look at those ships compared to the ships on the cover of Primordium so we can assume there is a whole foerunner colony there that could revive the Didact ....bingo....

i counted around 8 questions there and i will try to get to them all 1. It doesnt really matter what the previous life in the galaxy was. It is all gone and it wont affect the halo universe at this point 2. If you had just created an entire species of life, would you expect it to suddenly turn on you?? why would they, the creators, even expect their creation to have conflict with them after they had lived in peace for years?? 3. it is very likely that their creators were almost the same as them. They used a test ,like how precursors use the flood, to see would be worthy to inherit the mantle. It may not have been the precurors who wiped out all life, but it may have been the "test", Making the precursors the only species that was able to survive the test. Then that would give them the role of keeping the mantle. And the primordial said the humans would be "tested by floods" to see if they were worthy of the mantle. And the cycle continues.... 4. When the forerunners rebelled, it was probably at a time when precursors did not need a new species to take the mantle. They had not used a test or anything because they had the life in the galaxy was the way they wanted it to be and they themselves were thriving. When the forerunners rebelled, they were not being tested to inherit the mantle, so it probably made the precursors pissed off. They decided these acts of violence made the forerunners unworhty of the mantle becuase they were destorying life. there is a key difference in this act of the forerunners defeating the precursors......the forerunners REBELLED, they were not TESTED 5. I anyone knew why the foerunners rebelled, we would have discussed this by now. Hopefully it is revealed in Silentium. and my peacetime theory is meant to explain why the precursos lost. It is not meant to say why the war started 6. The precurors created the forerunners because there was no other life in the galaxy. If they were in charge of protecting and preserving life, what did they have to protect??Nothing. So they took charge and created life with good intentions. 7. I dont see why it matters if they left the galaxy. If your species was on the verge of extinction, wouldnt you try to escape to someplace safe?? that only place being out of the galaxy for the precursors. They only left so they could live, why would they take the chance of staying and becoming extinct?? 8. I have explained this before, the flood was an earlier form of the precursor species. It was also a test. With the precurosrs being driven out of the galaxy, someone would have to take control of the mantle in that galaxy. The flood, being the same species as the precusors, would test the life in the galaxy for their worthiness of the mantle. And if no species prevailed, then the flood would just evovle again and become precursors. i have a theory for why the test would not be a humanoid race. First reason is that the flood and precursors are the same, so why would the precurors create a brand new species to test the others?? they could just do it themselves when they felt the time for the test was ready. second reason, in the previous galaxy with life, the keepers of the mantle were probably a humanoid species. With the flood being a a parasite, they were easily able to pass the test of a humanoid species. Then they eventually evovled and became precursors. And these reasons also explain why the precursors even used a parasite as the test i hope these answers sound good enough for you. If you have questions, please ask them so i can clarify for you. It will also help improve my theory

.....greatest halo video ever......

i feels so new, yet so familiar...... thats the magic of halo

if the noob combo was as hard to pull off as you just said, then it wouldnt be called the noob combo. It has that name for a good reason