WonderWombat

Good to know I'm not the only person who finds it very easy. DMR owns all lesser aliens, and plasma pistol plus DMR owns everything else. Problem is the DMR isn't found in most of the game so a strategy Halo games never use comes to play. Burst fire the Assault Rifle and it basically kills everything.

No, fans should never be able to manage a game series. Giving criticism or suggestions is different, as that doesn't have to actually be taken into consideration.

I feel that he is being portrayed very similarly to the Covenant in Combat Evolved, just the ending was more underwhelming. We knew very little about the Covenant in Combat Evolved except that they wanted to go and kill themselves because that is what they believed. Similar to the Didact just wants to eradicate humanity because that is what he believes.

Problem with the vehicle design is that they have to submit to the power of game balance. Just about every single vehicle that has been in the main games makes little to no sense in its design. Warthog - isn't covered, and the turret guy is completely exposed Mongoose - pretty useless overall all things considered Ghost - again not covered from top or sides Hornet - slow and exposed, uses a form of propellers Falcon - Uses propellers and is again very exposed Banshee - Incredibly slow with poorly designed tail Wraith - Mobile Artillery acting as a tank... and its source of power is openly exposed on the back Chopper - same as ghost Spectre - same as Warthog Prowler - same as warthog Mantis - little armor and its internals are exposed like joints and wires Four in game vehicles maybe make sense and that would be the Scorpion, Elephant, Mammoth, and the Scarab. The vehicles in Halo Wars don't have to fall victim to this balance issue as players aren't necessarily dominating the battlefield with them. Battlefield can get away with this because of how it is designed. People can spawn completely armed and ready to destroy 3 tanks or a helicopter.

The PS3 had some wonky architecture. Both consoles right now have similar set ups though. However only Sony exclusives could potentially look better than Xbox. If they bring down the price in a few years and fix all the issues I might consider getting it. Nothing says success like 60% failure rating, that's right 360 I'm looking at you.

I heard that they are bringing it to PC. Will probably wait to get it then, and I really hope they add a Co-Op. Not a huge fan on the server thing though, we all know how DayZ ended up.

All of them scurry around too much. It would be far more challenging if the crawlers and knights engaged in more CQB. When the knight just chills with his scattershot and waits for you there is a problem.

Problem is there are 4 precision weapons. There are only so many spots to fill.

Okay I see now, only problem they would face is explaining why the forerunner there didn't do anything the first time around. Or it is just the other ark.

But the Ark is like a flower, not a ball.

Yeah, because they added them in a DLC. The werewolf doesn't actually exist.

John-117 with all things considered (like the books).

They should finally give the Covenant a tank.

Those are awesome, the only thing that would improve them would be scale. But I can see that the problem obviously comes from using two different brand of things.

Is the picture on the right of the ark? Or is it of the ark with a floating thing in the middle. Jagged rocks could mean anything, maybe it is the other ark we haven't visited.

I love those kind of things, Red Dead Redemption excelled in this regard extremely well. Like the haunted abandoned mansion, the werewolf. Anyways the helmet was just Bungie being Bungie and giving a nod at marathon.

They should totally add a V/STOL vehicle, like a Harrier or F35. Problem is they would need a massive map to fit such a potentially fast vehicle.

Chief crashed into the Pillar of Autumn afterwards, he clearly does not care for style.

I'll probably play GTA 5 like I did 4. Had some good time with friends on it, played half way through the story and quit cause I got bored.

What you want is a whole bunch of essentially useless features which just take more hours for programming and detract attention from important things like gameplay and plot.

Or just jump down all of the levels because the second level juts out in the middle.

Remember Halo 3, that is probably a good reason. "I heard you want to stop playing the game for 10 seconds...and again....and again..."

I doubt it would happen. It would totally negate the whole pride in being a warrior thing to just cheat to become amazing.

If they made the best game ever people still would have complained, simply because people are people and everyone is entitled.

Combat Evolved, easily. First off it has the health, so right away most of the game you are easier to kill than in any other one as the shield and health bar is less health than infinite health. Many levels are limited in guns and they disappear rather quickly, doesn't make for a good combo. The flood can't be destroyed the first time, and will always revive. The only way Halo 2 is harder is in Co-Op because of that stupid one man dies you both die system. Other than that Halo 2 fixed the flaws that made Combat Evolved difficult. If I had to order them personally it would go. 1. Combat Evolved 2. Halo 2 3. ODST 4. Halo 3 5. Halo Reach 6. Halo 4 A lot of people think Reach is hard, but you have to play it differently. Once you understand it is quite easy on legendary. I think I beat it in 10 hours.