WonderWombat

I think the Gravity Hammer will be multiplayer only, unless they have some type of brutes in the game.

I always hate it when you dual wield re loadable weapons, there is no way anyone is reloading it that fast with just one hand. Things like Plasma Rifles and Pistols make sense though.

I'm pretty sure the Spartan's intimidation factor has something to do with it. Basically they know they are dead. In ODST it probably would have just taken to long to change them.

The only use I can think of is when the other guy sword blocks you (or whatever that is called) then the other sword can swiftly kill them.

Well I didn't necessarily mean during the war. Let's pretend it was during the insurrection before they ran into the Covenant.

He just makes these from Styrofoam, well I found myself a new hobby.

I like brutes, but after events in Halo 3, and events described in Glasslands, I just don't see them making a big comeback. If they are included they should only be extremely well trained, only Chieftains maybe. They would be support to some of the Elites. In Glasslands there a few brutes that stayed loyal to the Elites, so a few could be there.

O'Connor said they don't have plans for one right now, but I wouldn't rule it out of the future.

Well the Sniper itself didn't seem to change much, just the scope, but the is all we really see. So it gives off the illusion that it is dramatically different.

You're mixing up the meaning od doubt with disbelief. The two things I quoted were doubt because they thought it could have a negative effect on people's memories. Disbelief in the same scenario would have them say something like, "we thought this would never work because it would ruin memories".

The flood didn't originate in the Milky Way, so they could always just venture their way back.

Well if the event of Glasslands hint at anything in Halo 4, then I'm guessing if there are any there will be very few.

A chitinous exoskeleton doesn't mean something is an Arthropod, they would have to have a few more things, which Grunts fill except having segmented body. Well at least it doesn't look like they have a segmented body. They would need a head, thorax, and an abdomen, but it seems like they are missing the thorax and abdomen. There was also a bulletin on Waypoint that suggested that these were genetically mutated by the Covenant, or they are a sub species of Unggoy

Microsoft's conference. They tried to promote the hell out of Kinect again, like the past few years.

I'm really expecting the campaign and Spartan Ops to be amazing. War games on the other hand seems to be something that would either be good or bad, I hope for the best though.

That would be the best piece of video game merchandise ever, well as long as it doesn't have the visor that the $800 costume has, make it a real visor.

6. Frank said they won't be making something to change the entire world on forge, but he said there will be some cool new additions.

I'm not a fan of the helmet, I think because I like the visors. And it says skin on the picture you provided, so I think it is a skin.

If they release a Halo 2 anniversary come 2014, then don't be surprised to see a demand for a Halo 3 anniversary when 2017 rolls around and so on. Also this isn't the interview I was looking for, but it may have to do. http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2011/11/343-industries-part-1/#more-94546 I think we are very conscious that people have very, very fond memories of when they first played Halo, and that’s not something that we wanted to mess with. Just to compound what Dan said, the magic of Halo and the “secret sauce” is the game-play, and if you moved it to a different engine, if you moved it to a different technology you’d lose that essence. So essentially they didn't want to mess with any of the memories fans had had, but they decided to make everything exactly the same, and that is why it worked.

No, they don't need to make a remake of every Halo game. It will make them look lazy and unimaginative. They had so many doubt about remaking CE, so I doubt they will remake 2 anyways.

I'm glad they are making a game type similar to Invasion. Maybe it will even be better.

I got the feeling that your weapon of choice would be limited. They have talked about weapon placement on the map. They made some thing that radomizes the spawnpoints of all the weapons. So I feel that we will be able to choose from typical weapons like ARs, BR's, DMR's, Plasma Rifles, Carbines, needlers, pistols, and maybe shotguns. Then things like snipers, launchers, and forerunner weapons will spawn on the map. So a mix between Halo and Call of Duty is what I'm imagining. A classic game type wouldn't hurt though.

I think only 5 people from Bungie actually left. Then a whole bunch of other people quit their jobs just so they could make a halo game. Thay is why I think Halo 4 will be so great because so many people who love the series are making the game. People at bungie were tired of only making Halo, so they didn't work as hard as they previously had.

Actually bungie was making it a RTS initially, then they changed it to a third person shooter. Then Microsoft bought bungie and they made it an fps. Anyways my top 10: 1. Halo Combat Evolved 2. Fallout New Vegas 3. Assassin's Creed 2 4. Red Dead Redemption 5. Halo 3 6. Warcraft 3 7. Borderlands 8. Battlefield 3 9. Fallout 10. Civilization 4

Also if there is a story it would logically explain a sky limit.