BaconShelf

This entire subforum is devoted to this. 343 does not read these forums, as they are not official. What exactly is the point of this thread? Oh, and please stop advertising your thread in others, it just clutters the threads.

Definitely not. Who did you hear this from? However, buying the war games map pass gives you Strider and Scanner helmets exclusive to that purchase. But no, only armour through specialisations, LE, pre orders or natural unlocks are in the game.

Most people will complain about anything because it isn't bungie. Glad you tried again. The game is not perfect, but no game is.

If say Didact too. If nothing else, those particle cannons on the ship were gutting UNSC ships through the middle!(If it could do that to infinity, it can do it to a frigate) The LNoS' glassing beam, however may destroy the forerunner. And MA is a giant space banana

Well they are called Spartans. With a 'T' shaped visor like Phase I Clone Troopers? (Star Wars)

Would be worth it.

DLC is in BTB. Everyone (all 16) needs the same DLC. If everyone had crimson, SLC maps would appear first. This was tried in Reach and failed, I hope they makes some more DLC only playlists

I find mm fun on 4. I hope they continue to put effort into campaign, as that is what has built much of the fanbase like me who read the books and go on the wiki to find out more. I'm happy for then to remove multiplayer entirely.

Might have been a pre-order emblem. Much like the bullets and spartan head.

I defend 343 because I have the right to, and believe they are doing everything they can to please everyone. Problem is, some people will complain about anything until Bungie is back. Do not tell people to stop defending 343. You have not yet given a viable reason yet. Oh, and I simply do not care about CSR, so that does not affect how I say things. Point being, forcing your opinion on others is what makes others force their opinion on you. I like to think I'm open minded, and try to let people say their thing, but when people force their opinions on me, I wonder why I bother.

I want the Super Mantis (the big mech being built on adrift.) That thing would be sooooooo OP but sooooo fun!

The disc space cannot handle that much. Nor do we have need for them. Two ARs? Two SMGs? Two Plasma Rifles? Etc

My disc ideas: Campaign (massive) Multiplayer/forge/customs SO/ (possible) firefight All three would have theatre installed. Ahhhh...

The CE/2 one is fine for campaign, but the driver having 360 HE rounds and 50. Cal is a little OP for multiplayer.

@Beastly I play with the Halo 3/ODST or Recon controls on all games, so I do not press wrong buttons all the time. I would like to be able to use the exact same controls every time. Still, fair enough. Suppose default allows you to switch to other games better.

Many people like the option for customisation. For this argument, why do Mass Effect, Fallout and The Elder Scrolls have character customisation? No one will see that. It is because armour can be something to work for, have your own 'trademark' or even simple aesthetics. Regardless of impressing other people. Point is, there are few things to work towards offline, and restricting that is not good. Halo 3 was a first try... Fair enough. But 4 did it again with the commendations...

The 3/ODST/Reach/4 one. Much more balanced.

Oh , misenterpereted that part.

Press the four squares in the top corner if you're on mobile, you can message people. Just message AD?

If you aren't enjoying it, there isn't a point playing. I agree there. It's wierd though, I never have a DMR problem. (carbine/ AR user) I get killed occasionally but never as often as you have said.

Fine 1. Terraria Pro It's like minecraft Con It's like minecraft Graphics suck (I know its intentional, but I don't like them) 2D game I do not enjoy gameplay Fortress craft Pro Unknown Con Yet another minecraft remake Worse graphics than minecraft Angry birds (never said IOS games don't count) Pro Likeable characters Challenging I like the art style Con Repetitive Boring Stupid little noises get repetitive

I liked Spartan Ops. I know many people who do to, I find it much more fun than mm.

I believe (I may be wrong) that Marty holds the copyrights to the old music. Either that or Neil wanted to make it his own feel.

I think a few maps focused for vehicular gameplay would be nice. Ragnaroks good, exile is too small for tanks, vortex... Just meh, meltdown can't handle warthogs very well. I believe a large map, capable of 2v2 tank battles with a few banshees and warthogs everywhere. That, is what ordnance should be for. To me, vehicular gameplay is what suits halo best. Anyway, I would prefer maps solely designed for vehicles, with man cannons/ teleporters for infantry travel (unnecessary as there are plenty of vehicles) Think SWBF/BF3 for an idea of what I mean. Add in halo vehicles and gameplay.... My perfect map. Hell, even Sandtrap or avalanche. They were perfect for vehicles!

No exclusive multiplayer stuff, I thought you meant that as well. Reach have many more credits to offline players for forge and customs etc. ( I was getting 12,000 per forge game) and it was good because ultimate could get everything. Then 4 had commendations and ruined it. Campaign specific (I didn't realise you mean that. Derp) would be brilliant, as well as promoting reayablility for the campaign! Honestly, I would just prefer the SPARTAN armour to have a more rigid, military feel. The 4 armours felt too anime and out of place for halo. Given some aesthetic changes, more angular and less curved, some existing ones do have a lot of potential! (CIO, Engineer, Ranger come to mind here) For the record, the aviator helm looks like a motorbike helmet... Operator looks better for a pilot IMO.