Kiing 0f Coffe

Wait, they're swaping dubs for snipers? That really stinks. Can they not just keep anything?!?!

Original Xbox. I had such great memories of playing starwars battlefront 2 when I was young.

Welcome to our wonderful community. I'm also glad that there is someone else here who enjoys battlefield.

Gravity mace. Not as powerful as the gravity hammer. But can still 1 hit and swings twice as fast. You can also switch to it faster.

K thanks.

So far the fire rate nerf is winning.

There should be some promethean tanks and speaders. That would rock.

Yes I did and I can't make it stop

Starcraft is an RTS and a very fun one at that. I'd simply like to know if anyone besides me plays it.

But doesn't it look like the DMR fires faster in game?

Life worker vision. An armor ability when casted on a friendly or enemy player. You get full access to their HUD, but you can't control the player.

But I tested it point blank on someones head and I got a 5-shot kill. The DMR has a faster fire rate so the faster five trigger pulls wins. Right?

Yah, but this is a 2v2. If they camp together then they will be getting all the kills they would be running around and out DMRing people. I'll just leave if it's infinity doubles I hate that garbage.

You do know that the DMR kills faster than the BR. So how can they be about =. Even if they did have the same kill time. The DMR is meant for long ranges, and the BR is meant for mid range. How is this fair? Oh yah and thanks for explaining the chart for me. I'm not quite the technology guru you are.

LOL I can't understand anything in that table can you translate for me plz? Why doesn't the table include damage per round or damage per trigger pull? The stats show itself. The only advantage the BR has over the DMR is the fact that it can kill with a shot to the head at 1/8th shielding. Thats it. All the rest the DMR is better. I'm not biased, you and all who know the exact stats are biased. Seriously, this game is not called Halo 4, return of the DMR. No, its halo 4 return of all the guns people liked. Woe is the Carbine user who suffers from under powered weaponry. Woe to the BR user who suffers to the use of a worse DMR. Woe to the assault rifle user, who's CQB weapon can't touch the DMR at any range. But peace and happiness radiates from the DMR user, who trumps all with his might. He has no worry about a gun being better in its surcumstance. Why would the DMR user want his weapon of triumph to go? To allow fans of other weapons a fair chance? Hah! Most go on there merry way and slap their bias on the thread. Defending their undeniable advantage. To leave the rest scrambling for an advantage, only to be dissapointed when they find none. For all to hail the DMR! King of Primarys. Never will it be dethroned. Defend the DMR! For with our king, we will rule matchmaking! Never shall it be nerfed. Never shall there be buffs. Never shall there be balance. For all must bow to the DMR user. All until the day. The day few stood up against the outrage. Dared to make threads against the DMR. Waged war against its supporters. That day. Started the road to a balanced kingdom. But the war is still raging. The king isn't easily dethroned. But it may happen. It will happen. When the creators of the kingdom came back to dethrone their poorly chosen king. To then make kings of all of the primarys. This is what I and many others strive for, a balanced kingdom of matchmaking. But for a kingdom to change for the better. We must discuss how the kingdom will be changed. But for since the first DMR thread. It has bean a verbal war on the DMR's supporters. For almost all want to keep their distinct advantage. We want the Halo 4 we were promissed. You want the Halo 4 your playstyle fits the most. For I still believe that any supporter of the DMR who has full knowledge off statistics, I deem biased. I can't be convinced other wise until changes are made for the better. Why give 3 options when I know I only need 2? DMR supporters. Remember who this game was built for. It wasn't you, it wasn't me. It was for halo fans of all playstyles. The BR guys, the Carbine guys, and yes, the DMR guys. Don't forget the storm rifle guys, the suppressor guys, and the assault rifle spammers. Even for the boltshot spammers, and the hollogramers. But no. The game's current state is only for the DMR guys. Sorry if I insulted you. Its only the truth.

Sit back with light rifle and snipe till they all die?

Ah yes, the reason for this is because there is no humanly way a person can know all there is about the DMR and the BR and think it is balanced without some sort of bias involved. This I assure you. Or someone could be an idiot. How am I over reacting? Im simply analyzing an imbalance that a lot of people agree with and I'm suggesting a course of action and asking the opinion of others for this course of action. I will probably slap myself if I see one logical post coming out of you.

There is always hope. And I assure you, I didn't cry when I wrote this thread.

I'll give it a chance. Looks exciting

Lots of stuf going on about the DMR being imba. But there is little talk about how to fix it. Here's a thread about how to fix it. I see about 4 reasonable ways to fix the DMR. A. Nerf DMR to have less power B. Nerf DMR to have less fire rate C. Buff BR and Carbine D. Buff BR and Carbine + full auto weapons (excluding SAW) Lets take a look at option A. Option A suggests to nerf the DMRs damage. This may appeal to those who want the weapon to become inferior. However, we don't want weapons to be inferior. This just causes rage threads about how the gun has no place in the game, kind of what has happened to the BR. Now, a six shot DMR doesn't look appealing at all when they could just have a 5-shot light rifle instead. So I would argue against option A. Option B has the more reasonable fire rate nerf. If we nerfed fire rate, we would have to be careful about doing so. We don't want it to still fire faster than the BR, but we want it good enough to compare to the light rifle. The best way about doing this making the kill time 1.9 secs, then giving it no flinching when scoped. This way the DMR ranged fighter still has an advantage over BR and Carbine users. Although, it would be an easy fix for Carbine and BR users to just use rogue. In this surcumstance the DMR user must keep distance and take advantage of his longer aim-assist and his small bloom spread. Vs. the Lightrifle at long distances the DMR must take advantage of his stablility advantage and maneuver alot. But the Light rifle user can still beat the DMR user if he hits all of his shots, but this was the way it already was yes? The nerf seems to make things a lot easier for light rifle rogue players to beat DMR users alot. Then we would have to nerf the Light Rifle. Which really just doesn't seem fair to the gun because of its difficulty of use. Option B is arguable but I would argue against it. Option C is about buffs. Buffing the mid range weapons to surpass the DMR's kill time seems to be a good step. It adds to the fast paceness of the game, which I like. But leaving out the assault weapons would just make them as bad as they were in halo 3. One can argue that the weapons deserve to be worse because they take less skill. I ,however, prefer to make all weapons as least inferior as possible. Option C is arguable, but I would argue against it. I like Option D. It brings the weapons to the level they appear to deserve. Now there are 2 main ways of executing option D. 1. Keep the auto fire weapons at very similiar kill times as the mid range weapons. 2. Bump the auto fire weapons above the kill time of the mid range weapons. You guys can argue about the last part. I'm indifferent about it.

No more rants? C ya. Plz come back for halo 5!

Some are humans. Some are Forerunners. I only posted this so that I could reach my 200th post

This game only caters to those who like short range and long range combat. Like mid range? To bad, the BR and the Carbine kill slower than the long range gun, the DMR. So might as well use it. The random ordinance is really stupid and should be scrapped imediately, but instead they make people play longer for requisition so they have a better chance of getting rockets than the other guy. The class system wouldn't be so bad if there was actual weapon balance. Right now the game is exceptional for a developers first game and I expect to have my socks knocked out of my house when Halo 5 comes out. Have hope! Changes are imminent and perhaps weapon balance will be one of them.

I see it everywhere. I don't know why. It doesn't even matter how hard you try.