Rafter

Sorry, but I can't agree with you on this one. Let me try to explain. Think that you're in war, holding a semi-automatic weapon, you see an enemy in the distance, you fire. Right? (let's not talk about etics now) Your problem is the fact that, if he is too far away, your weapon loses precision, the bullets dont shrink nor smth like that. Meaning: If a foe is too distance for a br/DMR/other-semi-automatic shot, you can shoot, but the precision of the weapon should decrease. Therefor, imagine sme is still far way, no matter how much time you take into putting his body inside your reticle, you always have a chance to miss, but, if you hit, it will hit as hard as if he was close to you. Obviously Halo's shotgun should stay the same and only hit hard in short distances) This leads to thinking of the need to aim a little higher for the shot to land where we want it to land (specially if we're thinking about snipers) Anything you didn't get, tell me ,

Yes, I know how frustating it is, I see it in almost every topic you made. Moreover, 73 topics in 2 days? Wow, If I dind't read some of them, I would think of you a spammer. (Either you don't have nothing to else to do, or you're very dedicated to this cause) Lastly, I know this is my second post on this topic and haven't said nothing about the Bloom. Thing is, I am not sure of which way I would prefer, all I know is: Bloom must exist and the reticle must expand, even if it doesn't cove the whole area where the shots land (think CS, you can have a very small reticle that only expands a little, but if you fire an assault rifle to a wall for more than just a few shots, you can see the reticle in the middle, fully expanded, and the wall full of holes outside the reticle are) Anyway, It must have bloom (why do people call it bloom and not recoil?),

Hum, agree Moreover, we don't lose anything, do we? Except time, though :roll:

Wow, What a fight! fortunately I was in the first row wathcing it! Just kiding, hope neither of you will take the sentece above seriously (I dind't even understand what the fight was about and DON'T want to understand) Anyway, ViolentDelights, can you just explain what you meant with the sentence below? Again, I DON'T want to create another fight, just 'd like you to explain the sentence, please (mean: If you are angry, don't use it on me) (You posted this 2 times) Thanks in advance,

Hey gollum, I see you've been writting some interesting posts and always asking people who don't write posts with any sense to explain themselves better; tough I think you'll grow tired, man. Some people are just not worth it. Unfortunately, it seems that most people who want Halo 4 to be a classic Halo seem to write it in this way, which is quite bad.(not all of them, a good example is the Arby). Tough, , they must be much younger and just kids to write things in this way (of course, there are always exceptions) so we I guess we're just asking them too much Sad,

Hi there; By the time I am writing this, you have already written 9 posts, in which only 2 of them are written with some order, justifications, and not using the word "suck" or "****", etc. So, about 78% of your posts are rubbish. Do you think you should keep like that??? Just look at your posts and at other people's posts! See the difference in writing. Getting tired of this,

It seems that people more conservatists haven't read this thread:http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=452 (PS: follow the instructions on the top of the first post)

Ok, Understand your point. Though, we're not talking about the gamers here. Rather about the game. If we were thinking about the best for the gamers, the threads would be much different.

Hope so, it seems we had a nice "thinking" momment here. Though, even if 343i is reading this, they keep not saying anything. Do you think that is just to leave us felling anxious? Cause we don't even know if it's worth to keep writing what we've been writing. Cumps,

yeah, already thought about apllying to work in 343i, but they said I was overqualified. Just kiding. Agree with the rest. you choose the type of multiyplayer (is that what we're talking about?, or do you have smth else in mind?) you want, or buy the bigger/limited/deluxe/whathever edition with everything but, obviously, not for the double of the initial price. So, Campaign would be featured in all, so as Forge, Firefight, Custom Games, Theathre and one multiplayer right? Again, very nice ideas,

So what is realistic, then?

Specially to: Can I say smth? http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=452,

Two things: First:I think that, altough we like the game, we shouldn't call it "such a great game". we are a minority of players who like a not-even-worlwide-know-nor-one-of-the-top-games-game. Although I do known that Microsoft most likely will only release Halo 4 to Xbox; Still, I have this idea of success and I decided to share it (Not saying you shouldn't argue against it, I hope people keep doing that, just explaining why I wrote it) Second: why do you think they would earn more money in separated disks? or do you mean as if they were two games and you had to buy both/the three/etc? Well, altough I don't like it vary much, it is definetely not a bad idea at all. It is actually quite a nice idea, but an extra investment in each multiplayer (featuring every little thing people here have mentioned and more) would need to happen. But, indeed, they would make a lot of money, Ps: Thank you for the consideration, (what you wrote in yor ps) Nice idea pal,

Thanks and no problem

Agree with everything you said. Though I would add this: Remember Halo 3? For example, the VIP gametype. a lot of "subgametypes" were created out of this. So, why not "subgametypes" out of this type of game. Some could be around the fact that the monitor would only work as an "engeneer", never atacking and could even only walk around in 1/4th of the map; Or work like a VIP, sme who must be killed. Anyway, I agree that the main gametype should have the ideas fom the post I quoted above. Nice ideas, men, Rafter PS: to people who didn't like, I hope that you don't think that, becase you didn't like, it shouldn't be featured in-game (just to be sure).

Can you put the link to the article please?? (I think this would just be obvious), Rafter

Oh, nothing too special (now that I think of it, I think I got this in the wrong thread, sorry ) Anyway, checked in other thread and couldn't find a better place to fit it in, so this must be the right place I must have thought that: in COD, with kills you can buy weapons and stationary stuff, and in your gametype and other (the Forge Battle), it is more or less the same. I like both, anyway. Nice gametypes, Rafter

Not sure if each type of game would use enough disk space to justify the need to use 3 different disks. Anyway, If they create a campaign as I said, they will definetely need a different disk for the campaign. Maybe Campaign plus forge or firefight in the same disk? Agree with rest; specially the part in which the sales volume would explode. It would be a situation win-win. 343i and microsoft would earn their money and we would earn the first of a new generation of entertainment game. Moreover, if this game kicks off, everyone will be talkin about it - people, foruns, websites - aiding the growth of the sales. Ideas on this, What if H4 came for all platforms? 'Cause, even if this games kicks off, Europpean people (who already hae a PS3) won't buy an Xbox just becaus of this. (for computer, they could make a pattnership with Steam. Steam is claimed to be very successful and only to feature very good games, so, habing the game on Steam would mean more success) If this happens, I think Xbox users could play matchmaking with PS3 with no problem (both uses the some kind of controller) Moreover this would add the need to create an in-game friends list, allowing Xbox-users to be friends to PS3-users and PC(When I say PC, I mean PC and MAC (although I won't put so much pressure on Mac)-users (Although Xobx/PS3 users could only play with PC-users in custom games (either campaign, forge, firefight or competitive custom games, but not in matchmaking) If this happens (men, it would be great, revolutionising the world of gaming, 343i would become know worlwide, etc) the PC- version would not need to come with Forge, because, as Forge would already have a free downloadable extention to the PC, PC-users would need to download as well (People with no Internet would not have access to this feature, but they are a very short minority) Moreover, you should sign in to 343i servers in-game, meanig that, if my pc-user-friend comes by and wants to play in my Xbox, he could use his profile, simply by signing in in-game (the achievements and gamerscore would need to be shaken, though, but, he could havesign in in the xbox with my XBL gamertag, but use his profile) God, this would be great, as well as a great oppurtunity to make some more money and fame to 343i. God, this woud be great Rafter

Agree, Moreover sme already made a post on this, you should find it and post there

Sorry, but I still prefer, my idea, specially because it includes, in a way, yours. I think that should be added as an "option" in my idea above. obviously the option should mention that the game is already running. Hope as well. Anyway, still prefer my idea, Rafter

Forgot to mention in the previous post, but I think it is better to mention here rather then in the previous post. Some people've been talking about armor effects. My first response would be to include that in the classic Halo group of playlies if fans of this type want it. ODST types could never have this New Halo, I don't know but, if the idea is to be realistic... Not sure anyway, and open to ideas. If you come up with smth, just post it, Rafter

Ok, I don't remember what clans in Halo 2 were (because I ended up not being able to play it online) but, by your description, it seems like Steam's groups. Why not? It is not obligatory for everybody. Don't know yet (don't matter if sme explains me) what would sme gain with this, but, if sme asks, I have no problem saying I agree. Keep with the ideas, Rafter

Check my two posts here: http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=452&start=40 (it's the first post in this page (page 5) and the "colorfull" post in the end) Please, give opinions, 343i, please say smth, Rafter

Hello everyone (to TheAcientGamer and the Arby) {(to TheAcientGamer and the Arby) It seems that you have had a nice discussion here. Though, I, too, have smth to say:} First: I would like to thank the Arby for the compliments made to my previous post (Yes, my idea was really to give everyone what they wanted (One thing I forgot, in ODST, I think people should start playing with the armor of a marine (or with no armor whatsoever) and, as they earn credits, buy new armor until they have a full ODST armor.) Second, some more ideas on what TheAncientGamer and I said before. About the rankings: Most people seem to like the idea to have a ranking system in which you gain credits for the quantity of games played and skill, watch here: http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=626 Now, and for the 10.000$ affirmation; this system is what is featured in.......(suspanse music).......COD! ok, not sure if it is exacly like what we've been saying before and is written in the link above, but I know they have skill levels and players earn CODpoints (the same as credits in Halo) to buy their weapons, perks and their stuff). For us, in the ODST and New Halo gametypes, the credits should be used to buy armor, some of which have some properties, as mentioned before. More ideas to the gameplay Muliplayer ODST group of playlists To start, I'd say people should start playing with the armor of a marine (or with no armor whatsoever) and, as they earn credits, buy new armor until they have a full ODST armor. Adding to my previous post; The ODST group of playlists should have playlists with small maps, to play like COD and bigger maps, to play like Battlefield, for example. The ODST group of playlists shoud have at least 1 (good would be 1-3) playlist in order to people being able to play without these new abilities and stuff like that. Meaning: it would be similar to the existent SWAT (moreover, this playlist could be really called SWAT) only fightig without an armor ability or advantage in some situations This would be something similar to the COD's Pure playlists (see the success it got them) Moreover, sme mentioned way before that, in COD, it is hard to be in lvl 1 and beat sme in lvl 50 and that he doesn't want to see this in H4. My answer: this would not be a problem in the classic Halo playlists neither in the like-Pure playlists (mentione above), and, in the others, the matchmaking system should try not to have aa player in lvl1 and another in lvl 50 in the same game, of course. (yes, I know I am mentioning COD, but it is to mention the success they had, not to tell say they we're the inventors of everything, like everyone is saying about the ADS thing) More ideas to the gameplay (for New Halo gametype and maybe for the ODST gametype) When playing COD and Battlefield games, if you need to jump out of a window or smth, you press a button and the guy jumps, Though, you're a spartan, write?, You can just jump over, right? But how come, a fully powered spartan can't do like in Crysis and jump, using the hands to grab a ledge above, pulling himself up after that? Moreover, when playing, at least Cryris 2, COD7 and Medal of Honour 2010, if you are running and press the crouch buton, you either slide, dive, roll (roll=evade AA with less distance covered), respectively. I think this could be implemented in H4, but which?, all of them have their vantages. (Adding them all cou be fun, like, running and double tap (for example to slide, tap 1 time to dive (people should be able to dive over small steps on the floor, not like in COD7 in which you can't) or press and hold the button to roll; This would be great but I doubt 343i will give us such an oppurtunity if having a great game (moreover, i doubt they'll give us what we've been writing )) Just one thing in the Macthmaking A new idea; check my post here:http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=632&p=4307#p4307 Nevertheless: the Friendly Fire or FF debate; I hereby say that I don't remember whether in Halo CE and 2 FF existed, can sme remember me? Anyway, I think a debate should open between the people who want the classic Halo to decide if FF should feature in the Classic Halo playlists or not (moreover, it could be featured in some gametypes and not in others) About ODST and New Halo playlists; the idea in these is to look realistic, so I think it should be implemented. Once again, it should be an Option in the custom games (Just stick to this; EVERYTHING should be an option) Last but not the least; Campaign! I wrote this, please ty tu understand (I din't write it agian because I am, somehown tired) "And you have a different character for each group of playlists, your ranking (skill and possibly credits/exp) should be separated one's from the others, and if they had 3 or 4 campaigns (One CD only for the campaign)(smth similar to Alien vs predator)(a spartan, and ODST, an elite and a Brute (or, if the forruners appear, a forruner) campaig), each campaing should earn credits for each different group of playlists. Is sme didn't understand please say, i'll explain it again." Just and idea, but What I really wanted to talk about the campaign was (please comment) If 343i creates a multiplayer as it was written in my previous posts, should the campaign have things like ADS and sprint, dust in the air after an explosion, destroyable environment, etc? Please comment. Last, really last (I know you're tired of reading)) more on Forge, could also be in the gameply section Attention, I wrote MORE on Forge, this are NOT the only ideas for forge In forge we should have destroyabe buildings and non-destroyable Mean: There is no point in having a forruner, UNSC or Covenant fully reenforced wall destroyable, and having have a small civilian buiding enduring blast after blast of tank-shots, rockets, grenades and shotguns blasts (check Battlefield BC2 for this (In fact, just check ths story trailers for this)) Moreover, in maps in which having a base is important (for example the "Blood Gulch series") the bases can't be destroyable, it makes no sense. Everything for now, I guess. Thanks for reading Keep posting, Rafter

Probably, Spark, in the end of Halo 3, before the firing of Instalation 04b, said: 343 Guilty Spark: (Shocked, Alarmed) "Bu-bu-but a premature firing will destroy the Ark!" Johnson: (dismissively) "Deal with it." 343 Guilty Spark: (quietly) "...will destroy this Installation." And, as the dreaadnought must have landed on the ark, ans has Truth died, I doubt anyone remebered to pick it up. Rafter