York

I'm not thankful for this game at all what so ever, if I could return it right now for half the price I paid for it I would do so in a heart beat. I would have been happier if the series had ended with Reach if it wasn't for the fact that I wanted to know what would happen to The Chief after Halo 3. I grew extremely bored of Halo 4 fairly quickly, hell I didn't even get bored of Reach as fast as I did Halo 4. As a long time Halo fan it saddens me to say that Black Ops 2 has a far more enjoyable multiplayer and that I haven't touched Halo 4 since I bought it over a month ago. Side note: Halo 4 was the single worst impulse buy I've made to date and I have no intention of buying another Halo game on impulse, if I ever purchase one again.

1.) Saying "no offence" and then saying something offensive doesn't cancel it out. I always think it's incredibly idiotic when people say that. 2.) The AR got a power boost, but that doesn't make it OP, the storm rifle is worse and the suppressor is worse than that at close ranges. 3.) I think the people that are whining about the assault rifles are the real wimps. Halo is a game of adapting and reacting to the situation you're put in, so you need to do just that. I never have a problem out DMRing someone who's using a AR so maybe you just need to get better at Halo 4.

If you want to essentially burn $60 than go for it, I still think it'd be an idiotic thing to do. 0/10 if I really hated it i'd see if one of my friends want it for a cheaper price than what Gamestops asking, that way they get a better price and I get a better return.

I don't know what game you were playing, but whenever I played Reach either CTF or Assault almost always got voted for unless it was a terrible map, whereas Slayer would be the next best thing. Even if an objective game type got the top vote 1/3 of the time i'd be more than satisfied, at least it would be a refreshing change from the one track "kill everything" mind frame.

The Mantis for most occasions and the Scorpion for when it's cold outside and I feel like over compensating.

I love that opening quote. Anyway, 100% agree. Hell i'd rather run around with a needler than casual walk around with an incineration cannon and go "Ka durg a dur I got yur!"

SMG and a Mauler for CQC

Here's your sign 343

Anyone who can use a DMR properly can dominate someone that's using an AR, no matter the range. Period.

One word: "Meh."

So let me get this straight. You think that because someone is lacking in skill, having a bad game, or is simply up against someone who's better than them that they should be given a crutch? That's not how life works, it's not how Halo works, and it's a terrible idea over all. You aren't rewarded for failing at anything other than CoD and I certainly don't want that mind set to have any place in Halo. If you keep getting killed you know what you do? You play more games and get better, you learn how to strategize, you learn how to use someones camping tactics against them. To sum it all up you improve, or you lose.

You should have titled this "Why Halo 4s Storyline Is Superior to Reaches" because Halo 4s match making is inferior to Reaches.

Would you rather have Active Camo snipers with AA efficiency moving through the map with a sniper rifle that can pass through multiple players, killing all of them instantly regardless of where it hits them? The laser is the only thing keeping the Binary from being an undetectable god of a weapon.

Just because it was implemented in COD doesn't mean it belongs in Halo. If a player's having a bad game then they just need to go with a different tactic. Halo has always been adapt or die, you make the choice.

You've been misinformed. There's no level requirement for the Venator armor.