Pretty much, yeah.
Game reviewers tend to try to be unbiased (at least most of them), but if they were all unbiased, they would all have the exact same reviews and scores for a game. Everyone is different, and even though graphics might be bad or you might not like the gameplay, that doesn't mean you have to hate the game. Everyone has a game that they love but everyone else hates. I'd say that how "good" a game is, is based on what you define as "good", which means the game is good to you specifically.
To put it simply, there's a reason that review websites use a numerical (1-10 or 1-5) system to rate games, instead of writing a review and saying that "this game was a lot of fun and very good", because "fun" and "good" are subjective terms, meaning that they come from the scope of one's experiences and personal tastes, contrasted to the number system which is objective.
It's all about how you, the player, define "good", "fun", things like that.