SilentCO1

Lol, just get CEA. Play it on normal view first. Don't switch at all. You need your first exprience to be like everyone else. Then play with enhanced mode, see the difference, love it. Same amazing game, made better.

Mark V with the first attachment. Well, I haven't bought it yet, so I can't see how the last attachment would look with my armor, but I think it would actually look pretty good. Security. The first and last attachment look good. The base is pretty good too. CQB. I'm more of a close combat type person, so it suits my style. Operator. I only use the first attachment (Up-armored variant, I don't like the camera thing). I also think of close range combat when I see this so yay.

Maybe. Hopefully there are some Low-G type maps like Anchor 9, with inside and outside, but the outside is much larger and allows for some vehicles that operate well in Zero G environments (Full flight but only in zero g, very small).

Well considering that Halo: CE and Halo 2 were made for the original Xbox, and Halo 3 wasn't, it would make sense. Why make a remake of Halo 3, when it's still for the same console and you can still go buy it. Halo 2 wasn't made for the 360, so it would make sense to have a remake. Halo 2 and CE also had the best campaigns out of all Halos in my opinion, and many others. And they don't need to make an all new multiplayer for it, do what they're doing with Halo Reach and Halo: CEA. But this time with Halo 2 and Halo 4, since by the time Halo 2 Remake would come out Halo 4 would have been out for awhile. Just add some new maps and remastered campaign.

They would replace the Covenant vehicles. The Covenant got their hover technology from some Forerunner tech they found. So they will either be hover, or something better. And they would look better than the Covenant Vehicles, which would be even more awesome. And probably shoot some kind of lasers instead of plasma bullets, since the Sentinels and 343 Guilty Spark used laser weapons.

Microsoft isn't stupid enough to make a game every year. They know Halo would be terrible if it came out every year. Halo 4 was confirmed in an interview with Frank O'Connor to be in development for 2 years already. So Microsoft already had everything planned out and Bungie was planning on leaving long before Reach came out. And we still have another year and a half. 3 1/2 years to work on Halo 4. Compare that to CoD. It won't be terrible. And I wouldn't mind a Halo Wars 2.

Smarter person wins. They're using the environment to their advantage. If you knew the map well enough, you would know one was there and it wouldn't be smart to go around the corner. Try and get him to come out or wait for your shields to respawn or just find another target.

How about non-UNSC ships. Forerunner vehicles.

I don't really care. It's part of Halo. I do it a lot, I just hate when people T-bag you and they didn't even kill you. That's just stupid. Then I go, kill him, and T-bag him the rest of the game.

Maybe they could be used in a certain gametype, where you have to destroy the enemies base and you each get one of those. Once it blows up, you have to wait 1 minute for it to respawn, and keep the enemy away from your base. Or make a Sumo Wrestler playlist.

Well there were Mech type things in the Halo universe, Cyclops I think they were called. I think that's what they were planning on using for the Spartan I Project, but Halsey created the Spartan II, then III Project. So I'm not sure what they did with them, probably modified them so a regular soldier could use them. That was originally going to be the Spartan's suit, but it was too big so they never used it. These could be put in, but it would change everything so much, I'm not sure if I would be comfortable with it. It doesn't feel like Halo if it was put in, even if it was there already.

Reach has over 100k people online whenever I'm on. And yeah, nobody would play the Reach one. They want to keep it alive. And what's wrong with Reach? It's a great game. I love the multiplayer. So what if there are AA's, it makes it so you have to think more while fighting, not just walk around and spam your AR or Magnum.

Most likely will be I think. They hinted at it by saying they were going to do something that hasn't been done with Firefight yet. So I think Floodfight.

Halo wouldn't be the same 3rd person all the time. Only on occasions like turrets, vehicles, some AA's, etc. those things.

Nope, only when using a turret or some armor abilities, like AL or beginning to put down a drop shield. Special occasions, not all the time. It's unfair to the FP guys, because with third, you can see around corners.

This, but Campaign only. But really, It's Master Chief now that I think about it... How would you change his armor? Nvm, don't add this. Unfair advantage to higher ranks.

I'm hoping for both Floodfight and Floodvasion. They're different. I think Floodfight would be more like just fighting off hordes of Flood that get stronger each wave or something, or they infect the dead flood unless you shoot their dead body again so more will attack you, making it more difficult. Floodvasion would be what I listed above, an all out invasion gametype with a twist: the flood.

This was more of a joke kind of thing when I first made it, but now that I think about it, it could be made and would be really cool/useful. When you use it, you would get set into the position to jump (You're in third person at this time, and can still shoot) then you do the flip and land and are in first person for like another second before you land, and if you're shooting, each weapon would have their own cool looking shooting while in this position, like the SMG would be like you move a little while you shoot, then you go back to normal after the land. With other weapons it does nothing, but some have it. This would make it so you can still see clearly while shooting, see how cool it looks, and effectively use the ability, as well as maybe see some surroundings.

Yeah I have a feeling I'll be switching between graphics a lot lol. Just to see the difference, especially in how the flood look on the Library.

I don't really get what you mean by "Aussie". But we're not a tryhard MLG clan. We never play MLG. We play a lot of Invasion and BTB though, pretty much anything you want as long as we have enough people or close to enough. We sometimes to custom games too just for fun and forge sometimes. You can contact me on our site listed above for any more information.

This is in Dead Space? I didn't know that, I've never played any of those games. And I think those games copied Halo personally. Well Firefight was more copied from Horde mode, and didn't turn out nearly as good. Zombies, well it's nothing like the CoD zombies, but Floodfight would be. Floodvasion would be unique, like Halos Invasion gametype, but with the Flood.

At the moment, I think the original CE Master Chief looks better. The helmet actually looks more detailed. The new one looks more basic and less detailed, and the visor is too shiny. But, they have a lot of time to fix that, so no worries. And okay Spectral.

Well there are more members in the Reach community, therefore they see more of a need to make that game better. Especially since the community said they screwed up Reach, so they'll also be busy with Reach. Not much time for Halo 3 and Halo Wars.

Nice, it won't let me post mine for some reason. It says I can't use that image extension on this board. It's on Bungie.net though, it finally updated after a month lol. I'm still not sure if I like the Collar/Breacher chest or the Tactical/Patrol chest. And yeah, Field Marshall wasn't hard at all. Hero to Legend is just another 200k cR. By the time i'm a Legend, I'll have my Pestilence, Security last attachment, Assault/Breacher Wrist, and be halfway to getting soft case utility.

Reach is fun if you play the right gametypes, and especially if you play with friends. Just have to "Adapt" as everyone says on the Bungie forums.