howzthatdictate

If it was simply win vs loss(maybee some streak bonuses/penalties), your experience playing no part, and it was made to where you couldnt play with someone more than 10 ranks apart from you, derankers and boosters wouldnt exist.. simple solutions.. make 2 or 3 playlists ranked. the rest social .. and everyone should be happy, no? ranked doubles, social doubles, ranked infinity, social infinity. etc. shouldnt be a problem here. its been long enough. even arena in reach was better for a competitive player.. i just cant understand why the system is not in and now.

What is the problem? Halo 3 was the best competitive game ever for one reason. the true skill 1-50. arguments against the ranking system are contributed either by people who just cant match up .. or complete clowns.. let us have the ranking system. this isnt a care bear game.. its halo. the player base will go up.. and the care bears can cry.. they can play cod. the true halo players will stay. i cant even tell you how many of my friends refuse to pick up a controller until it comes back.. this is getting pathetic.. and waypoint is a joke .. get real.. put the ranking system back in.. just the same as h2 and h3.. when the playerbase was more then respectable.. why put out such a great game.. and then force it to fail by refusing to implement the most important part.. and one more thing, carebears, how could you possibly argue against a ranking system when youre also given a social playlist identical to the ranked ones.. pathetic.. truly pathetic.. the highest rank i ever achieved was a 49. and when facing a 50 in doubles i knew id better bring my A game +. halo reach and halo 4 id turn my xbox off half way through a match.. who cares... my playing accounted for nothing anyways..lets get real here.. since halo 3.. my heart rate hasnt slightly increased once while playing.... loosing patience..No ranking system = people quitting matches, then quitting halo all together gg 343 ...preciate it