-
Posts
122 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Halo Articles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Books
Movies
Everything posted by Herodanny
-
Okay, getting better is "fun". And just because YOU 1 person out of every 300 people want to play no ranks whats so ever, then fine, but you are clearly the minority. Ranking system matters for a LOT of people and the halo 3 social list is not "dead" as you claimed. I played halo 3 social slayer literally 45 minutes ago and I had no problems finding a match. I discredit your argument completely.
-
Couldn't agree more.
-
"On September 9, 2008, it was announced that Ensemble would be closing after the release of Halo Wars." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensemble_Studios Ensemble studios, unfortunately, no longer exists. Maybe there will be another halo wars 2, but it doesn't seem likely.
-
Remember this guys, after you build you supply pad hit the back button and check their ranks. If they are Generals then expect a rush, I am a general and I never rush noobs (I like to milk them for points, trololollol) but when I see another General it is on, I will rush like there is no tomorrow, because if I don't, then they will rush me. It's like, you got to hit them before they hit you. Btw, Hornet rush w/ forge is amazing as long as they are human and not Anders.
-
Aside from halo 2, halo wars had the best story line. It's cut scenes were amazing, it was filled with action (spartans fending off elites at end), amazing graphics (probably the best out of ANY halo game, so far), and just an amazing story. I'm sorry all you Reach and halo 3 fans out there. but Halo 3 had a TERRIBLE story line, it could of been great too, which is a real shame. Halo reach was so boring and the story line wasn't as bad as 3 but it was still dry. Halo 2 is the only game that surpasses halo wars in terms of story line, but I won't get into that. All in all, halo wars was an amazing game and I would of loved to see a sequel, too bad it will not happen :'(
-
No, If you actually played halo 2 then you would know, that everyone liked them except the xxxxx level 5's. Staff Response removed word as may cause offence
-
ahaha, yes man, I love those glitches, it made the game more interactive. It's like in the back of your mind you knew there wasn't some retarded shield barrier preventing you from escaping out of the map. It didn't ruin the game, it made it amazing! This is mine, Story - Halo 2, Halo wars, Halo CE, Halo ODST, Halo Reach, Halo 3 Gameplay- Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo CE, Halo wars, Halo Reach, Halo ODST
-
Yeah, This game has some much controversy because we all want the best out of halo 4. So it often concerns us and thus makes us feel the need to go off on tangents about other major issues concerning the well being of halo 4. ahhh, community...
-
I noticed people complaining about the halo 2 multiplayer, first off, the multiplayer is not what this thread is about, but if you want me to talk about multiplayer, fine I will briefly tell you what I thought of it. I found that the multiplayer was fast paced and extremely fun, button glitches = skill. Hands down. End of discussion. Also, the BR was AMAZING I admit the sniper was a little OP but it didn't matter with the amazing BR you could combat it if you were good. Halo 2 had fun zombie types, glitching out of the maps, super bounces, endless TOP games (tower of power), and also had an amazing community. Halo 2- 3,045,003/ 5 stars
-
I understand what you are saying and can agree to an extent. However, this is a thread about ranking system. Sorry.
-
That explains a lot about you.
-
A lot of ideas on here are good, some are bad though. Who wants BR to be less powerful? If anything it needs to be more powerful (from halo 3) meaning they need to have hit scanning. Also the banning system is a bad idea. Who wants to be banned for killing teammates? sure, boot me from the game, but from matchmaking forever? also this could extend to the mute-ban, which was a colossal failure (remember halo reach MLG, stupid....). Also fall damage is stupid. However, I like the idea of a custom game search, etc. Also #19 makes no sense....
-
No, not sarcasm. I am on your side. You see the truth.... like me.
-
I'm sorry you think this way. Ranks should always go down or up because that is the struggle you must endure in order to be the best (level 50) halo 3 showed your highest achieved rank. So you never had to worry about really "Losing" your 50.
-
We actually came to an agreement, (I think we did at least) the agreement was that you rank up from winning and winning only but you will have a service record (like in reach) where it displays your K/D, W/L, Objective, accuracy, etc. This will allow players to have the ability (for bragging rights) to show off their K/D, etc. while still maintaining the number (1-50, or 1-100 whatever they decide to do). If halo 4 has a ranking system (like reach) where you lose and STILL rank up, I will not even buy it. YES, it means that much to me.
-
bless your heart :')
-
I am not in favor of sprint, but it is in there now and it will be in there when the game is released (unfortunately) I really wanted 343 to revert halo back to it's roots (gameplay as similar to halo 2 % 3 as possible) but I doubt that is going to happen... I will try to remain positive about halo 4, but seeing sprint really makes me sad... 343 seems like a good gaming company and I think that if they release halo 4 with a mix of reach and 3 features and people stop playing 4 and start hating on it 343 will finally understand that halo reach is not the way to go, it is the WRONG way to go. Thus they possibly will revert back to halo 3 style, which would just make me so happy. I still don't know how I feel about this, I am not "pumped" for halo 4 but I am going to try because I feel that it is the only hope. Halo 2 is gone and halo 3 is dead halo reach is going to die soon too (thank god).
-
Idk, they better not add a story line to multiplayer... *shivers at the thought*
-
I would love to see this in all modes, It was in halo 2 and it worked out great, I guess they took it out because of button glitches? Umm Idk, bungie is a bunch of retards. 343 isn't though, so maybe we will be alright.
-
That's what I thought too. Right away, I checked around for a "sprinting Circle" on the HUD but didn't see one, I thought the light on his back was just in the decal with the armor. Hopefully that is all that it is. As for armor abilities not operating the same way, I mean... Well... I guess we can just stay optimistic. Yeah... That's what we will do.
-
What did I say? STRONG Evidence for AA's.
-
I hope you're right. You have to understand, for the last 5 years I have been getting disappointed from every halo game, when Reach released 2 years ago I nearly gave up all hope, I guess I am remaining open minded (or pessimistic) to the idea of halo reach (the biggest disappointment so far) from influencing 343 and halo 4.
-
I think your nose is a little brown
-
Well I am not completely against sprint, I am scared because the graphics kind of look like reach in a way. Bungie with halo reach changed a lot of things, if 343 changes everything back it would be surprising. If we have sprint, there may be a good chance that there will be jet pack, armor lock, etc. Sprint is a decent tactical addition to halo 4, but I don't deem it necessary. Halo 2 was very fast paced and it didn't have sprint.
-
I can live with that, as long as there is the 1-50 I am happy.