DriverRetro

Name: Star Citizen 42 Platform: PC exclusive Genre: Arcade space FPS and Exploration. Brief Description: Wing Commander with better graphics, online gaming with other players and the classical space opera. Similar to: Elite Dangerious Name: Elite Dangerous Platforms: PC exclusive Genre: Space simulator FPS. Brief Description: A focused space simulator battle with Zero G and inertial guidance system. Similar to: Star Citizen 42 Name: No Man's Sky Platforms: PC, PS4 Genre: Space exploration and Space Battle FPS with micro management. Brief Description: A focused space exploration battle with resource collection and open box arena. Similar to: Star Citizen 42 but the objective is exploration more than battles.

The flood should not return. The old crutch should leave Halo allowing other fiends to arise. The whole thing should focus on new Fore runner technology, the ancestors and new races. There are older and far better technology than the fore runners. The story should not stay there. The world of Halo should grow on other directions than the Fore Runners, Covenant and the Flood. The flood had a chance and it was well addressed in three games. It is time to move on and try other ideas.

Flood. That was a big mistake. That thing should be left out forever. There are other things out there in space like new races and the ancestors, prior to the forerunners.

Meh.... Could have been better...

Keep it. ^^. Console peasants should have the game. It is what the pleb deserves....^.^ : 3.

After reading the content of MCC I prefer this game to stay on the XBONE forever. I'm no longer interested in it. It went under my expectations.

As I said, should I care? No. I'll continue asking because we PC players are interested in it. Doesn't matter if 343i cares or not. I do care and I want good games on PC.

I don't care. I'll be rattling their doors, ears and probably hack, if I could, the game to make the whole thing available for PC. There are clients waiting and I'll pay for the game too.

Many of us understand the POLITICAL STANCE adopted by MS. We have to wait and comprehend their economical needs. I'm aware of their practices, scopes, expectations and policies. Rarely Halo MCC will debut on PC. If it does the whole thing will happen at a later time where the relevance of it will be diminished. Many of us want the game on PC because there is a hungry sector of that demography who sees something good in the Halo Franchise. The mod community wants to contribute, add fresh ideas, start different game mods and adopt different play styles. The PC community can program, model and propose different levels. Developers will be able to see fresh ideas being tested without them working or spending money on trials and errors. They will design with proven statistics of good levels designed by the community. This could be of great support for 343i. These developer will start their next designs around ideas tested by the community. The product will become relevant to the needs and expectations. Instead of going all out on graphics, procedural tessellation, high resolution 343i will be focusing on game play tweaks, designs and elements for replay value. Why MS is so short sighted and dimwitted? Can they truly become more of a dumba,ss morons than they already are? The Xbox one will be sustained if MS invest in variety instead one title brand. If they can't comprehend that, their whole business strategy will collapse. Their game titles should be exclusive and good otherwise they will end up shoving the XBOX one in their a,ss like they are doing right now. Believe me, the xbox one is a big box, it will be hard to fit the whole thing in the duodenum. We don't want that, no of course, however MS need to be more organic and flexible with their policies. I don't mind waiting, but waiting for ever for something unlikely to happen leaves a bad soar on MS name. They should be more cautious and generous with their clients. After all, we made them riches and relevant to the market, am I right?

We need a some sort of garage to mount and modify the vehicles. WHY WE DON'T HAVE ONE ALREADY?...: P The goose should be customizable like the other vehicle variants.

First, don't tell me what to say, think or do. Second, I'm a PC elitist, you are absolutely right on that. I'm passive on these forums because I accept console gaming. MS made a fiasco and they have to pay for their stupidity. Their lack of vision threw them into this mess. They have to pay dearly and deal with the consequences. No one forced them to do those short comings. Their lack of perspective and their random selection of priorities threw the Xbox behind. Common sense says that not everybody wants to pay fees for borrowed games. Not everybody wants to purchase a code to play a borrowed game. That alone threw many gamers off shore. The other imbecile move was the idiocy of Kinect and all of its uselessness. That made the console too expensive under an inferior architecture in comparison to the PS4. Those are hard facts that are already established. You can research those. MS, if they are truly interested in selling units, they have to invest on first parties, deliver true next generation games for the Xbox one and focus on the player and better online services. MS is arrogant and petulant in many moves. They act too condescending as if they where the only one on the competition. And their game studios are on a halt. The question is this. When MS will truly have next generation games instead of the excrement of cross platform games? When MS will INVEST in technology for graphics optimization and graphics quality for better and smoother frame rates? Where is that code? Is MS going the same path of depending on Halo all the way to move consoles? The stakes are these. PS4 is a superior console. MS decided to go behind in the tech department. However the WiiU has a wonderful list of games under a true inferior console. In other words hardware may be important but the attitude of delivery of MS is just horrid. They have to stop being so clumsy and stupid over important decisions. "Xbox one is not a proper console ? " Xbox one IS NOT a proper console. It is a media center. It tried to be the jack of all trades and failed miserably. When MS hires designers for the next console, then you can be deeply sure that MS is not doing well with the current one. That's the very basics. Can the Xbox 1 offer good games? Yes of course. Hardware is not a definitive trait for purchase. However if the library is weak, and it is weak right now, people are going to look for the PS4 library and to be honest it looks way better than the one promised by MS. Oh and more news.... http://www.newsledge.com/2-big-surprises-yesterdays-npd-report-7890 Told ya.

MS is getting FLOWERED pretty hard as expected. http://recode.net/2014/07/17/microsoft-to-shut-down-xbox-entertainment-studios/ The fiasco of the Xbox one launch is hurting their economy pretty hard. MS felt behind for many dumb reasons. At least the top drones are getting a good lesson on what players expect. MS please, next time, learn how to make a proper console. Thank you. : )

"Ms has lots of first party devs and even one or two third party devs under is belt. Games move systems, and Halo is one of those games that is going to move systems, Halo the mc collection Halo 5 Crackdown 3 These three games are the most hyped first party games of the Xbox one from what I have seen as of now. Did you notice it? Halo is one of these, Halo is going to move systems, lots of systems, I cannot count the number of people I have met who are getting a xbox one just for Halo." They can prioritize selling consoles. I don't mind waiting a year or two. We want to see the game on PC because it has lots of potential. I do know MS strategy but they should not leave PC users outside the loop. We want to see a great game on a platform that can elevate it to a higher position. It will benefit 343i on the long run.

MS always need something to sell. However can it sell well? Can really satisfy clients? Can MS see a perspective in it while they sale? MS moves XBONES not one hit titles like they did with the 360. MS should invest on native first parties like Sony did and develop with a good investment instead of pulling cheap thrills. Halo on PC will move Halo hence the benefit for console players will be greater and in the long run MS will get a steady sale of the title and the console. How about DLC from the PC community? How about map packages at a fair price for the Console community with the ideas of the PC players? MS went deeply imbecile when they included kinect, their weird policies of borrowed games. MS should stop depending on these crutches and get their crap straight. Consoles are moved when MS decides to BUILT UP A LIBRARY of good games. The dependence of very few brands is the stupidest thing to do. MS did that for the last ten years with the 360.

THIS IS A MAP....a well crafted one. Yes, who doesn't want to see all those moving parts and hear the cannon firing? Kudos for such amazing work and display of talent. Now I know why many call Halo forge the Little Big Planet of the FPS genre.... If you have more stuff like this, please show us.