@TwinReaper: Im not sitting here and telling you anything. I was actually trying to vent a concern that I have seen happening across the board towards 343i but I was duped by the name of the website thinking that it had some affiliation with said dev.
I was set straight and the conversation took a friendly turn. Your comment is fairly curt and condescending, especially when you are trying to project your perception of the value of gaming on to me. I AM affected by not having a set of armour that someone else has in halo 5, because a am a fan in every sense of the word. If I am willing to pay $250 for the limited collectors edition, thinking that this is the version with EVERYTHING in it then why would I not be upset if I find out that there are exclusive retailer deals that are being left out of the $250 monstrosity.
I have pumped $1000's into memorabilia and the LE games over the years because it makes me happy. I work like a dog, I look after my family, but when it comes to my own time, nothing makes me happier than sci-fi. Halo being one of my most revered fantasy universes.
If this is simply a case of timed exclusivity or paid dlc down the road, I can begrudgingly except that, doesn't mean I have to like it or bend over, pull down my pants and take one for capitalism. We are nothing but sheeple to most of these companies, so if I come across something I don't like, I find it better to have a voice, even if I do disturb the flock hanging of their teats.
@Caboose: I generalised the gaming landscape when I mentioned that we are no longer rewarded for our efforts. Before the horse armour for Oblivion was launched, everything that a developer would make in the way of window dressing would normally be an unlockable in the game. The easiest way I can explain it is this way:
I have accepted the business model. There are multiple point of entry, basic game, special edition, limited edition and limited collectors edition, ranging from $60 to $250. Now... If I am a true fan, I want everything that game has to offer so I lay down $250 to get everything because that is what I want. THEN... I find out there was more to the game and those part are only available by pre-ordering at a specific retailer. So then I look at my $250 purchase and I think... "that's not right". If I am willing to pay the price of entry for the most expensive package, should I not have the option to own the whole game?
You see, this business model does not benefit the gamer. It's the same with multi-plat games too, Batman had exclusive costumes on the PS3. Say if you are a fan of Batman, comics, films, cartoons, games etc, but you owned an xbox. How would you feel knowing there is no way for you to have the classic tv show batman costume just because capitalism said so. I don't like it and I never will.
If you really think I'm taking this wayyy out of hand, that is your prerogative. I know that us gamers are getting the short end of the ****ty stick.
@rrhungtington: lol.
Anyways, this topic is now null.
So long and thanks for all the fish.