Jump to content

Lolmenade

Trusted Members
  • Posts

    319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Lolmenade

  1. What do you do when you have the best fps of all time on xbl ? Answer = leave it behind, then remove it ! Are these people stupid or what ? Let's take Halo 2 to the 360 and call it Halo 3. Let's remove all of the features that made Halo 2 great i.e clans, superjumps, the maps and Team Snipers. That should really boost the Halo franchise lol The graphics were better, and there were no blue screeners, wow ! but the heart was removed. CONGRATULATIONS FOR DESTROYING HALO Nothing in this paragraph is fact. You have no proof on Bungie saying "Let' remove all of the features that made Halo 2 great..." "That should really boost the franchise" This is just information you pulled out of your ass. Why oh why oh why is the Reach Engine even worse than Halo 3 ? It has become a kids cartoon. The weapons are awfull aswell. Opinion You need to speak up people, before Halo is gone forever, because THESE PEOPLE DO NOT REALISE THAT HALO 2 SHOULD HAVE BEEN KEPT ALIVE and given a new lease of life. Speaking for the entire community. Your ignorance blinds you. Stop dwelling on Halo 2. It doesn't support your argument. Oh by the way, if you do ever decide to try and save Halo, DO NOT BRING BACK HALO 2 WITHOUT SNIPERS, CLANS, SUPERJUMPS AND THE SAME MAPS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There's no need to save Halo. It's not in distress. DO NOT USE THE REACH ENGINE, DO NOT CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE, WE'RE SICK OF IT, IT IS JUST GETTING WORSE AND WORSE AND WORSE. ALL WE ASK IS FOR HALO 2 WITH BETTER GRAPHICS AND NO BLUE-SCREENS. Opinion. P.S I havn't finished yet :-) no silly jet-packs, rediculous noises, grenades that go way too far, stupidly fast moving characters with silly flames here there and everywhere ! Halo is not the X-Men ! Let's have some realism back please ! Silly jet packs? Opinion. Ridiculous noises? That doesn;t even make sense. Grenades that go too far? You have a genetically altered super-soldier. They going to get thrown far. Flames? Just for fun and cosmetic purposes. They do not interfere with gameplay. Realism? Since when were sci-fi shooters realistic. I fail to see any proof. The only thing I see is information you pulled out of your ass and labeled as fact.
  2. No, it's people like you who don't have open minds and can't accept the fact that Halo: Reach is different.
  3. Sorry for the double post but this is just plain stupid. How can you call a sci-fi shooter realistic?
  4. Very ignorant of you to speak for all of the Halo community. This is all based on what you feel. Biased thread is biased.
  5. So what are your resolutions for the year 2012? I want to travel more and visit other countries. Preferably France.
  6. Wow that's pretty cool. Maybe I'll try it in my free time.
  7. I haven't played this in a while!
  8. Halo: Reach ranking system was good but they should add the Halo: 3 true stats.
  9. It's alright. Campaign is amazing but multiplayer isn't all that.
  10. I've heard of it, but I've yet to experience it yet. It's very uncommon.
  11. Go here. It's what I use to plan out what I want my Spartan to look like before I buy something off The Armory. Do not link or post that sites url again! It is not a legitimate site.
  12. I've been here since July and I've yet to become a Trusted Member. I need to be more active in this forum.
  13. The best way would probably be to go to their official website and message them there.
  14. I just purchased a pre-paid debit card. Yay.
  15. Merry Christmas Eve from Connecticut.
×
×
  • Create New...