So 7 out of 10 on EGM for not being like Call of Duty. No iron sites and no big scripted events like Call of Duty. Reviewer said it had no soul and is stuck in the past by not updating to " proper shooting mechanics" So I old hope a game " journalist" would know the Halo cannon and that Spartans use their H.U.D. to target, it ain't Call of Duty so why take points away from a game for staying true to its fiction? Am I just to into Halo? No. Just sick to death of every so called game reviewer who obviously doesn't play games. Are these negative reviews gonna hurt 343's incredible job in taking Halo into the future? I think they deserve more praise just for giving Halo back it's down as best looking shooter not to mention the fact that they obviously care about the story more than Bungie did.