Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'essay'.
Found 2 results
-
So I wrote a simple personal essay for my English class as a form to graduate. The teacher said she liked it, I'm not so sure as to what though. She didn't specify anything. You guys are free to criticize my writing and tell me your thoughts and opinions on the subject. I hope you enjoy it! If not, that's okay. I can't make everyone happy. Friendship Is there anything left to say in regards to companionship after such a large number of awesome writers have picked over the bones of the subject? Presumably not. Aristotle and Cicero, Seneca and Montaigne, Bacon and Samuel Johnson, Hazlitt, Emerson, and Lamb have all taken their splits at it; since the ancients, fellowship has been a kind of examination subject for the individual writer. It is somewhat the very presence of such radiant former models that baits the newcomer to emulate the others' example, and halfway a self-referential part of the class, subsequent to the individual article is itself an endeavor to create a kinship on the page in between reading and writing. Our initially endeavored kinship are inside the family. It is here we hone the procedures of listening thoughtfully and demonstrating that we can be trusted, and take in the kind of thoughtfulness we can expect consequently. I have a sister, one year more youthful than I, who frequently dealt with me when I was growing up. Once, when I was around fifteen, not able to rest and shuddering wildly with the a fever, I chose midst the night to go into her room and wake her. She talked to me, performing the essential administration of a companion vicinity and the chills went away. There is something spoiled about these family kinship's. This same sister, in her frail youthful stage, let me know: "You adore me on the grounds that I'm related to you, yet in the event that you were to meet me surprisingly at a party, you'd think I was a rascal and not worth being your companion." She had me stuck an imbroglio: I had no chance to get of testing her speculation. I ought to have contended that regardless of the fact that our bond was not unreservedly picked, our choice to chip away at it had been. Still, we are fast to release the favoritism of our relatives when they let us know we are skilled, charming, or adorable; we must go out into the world and allure others. At present, I appreciate twelve friends for their special identities, without asking that anybody be my soul-twin. Whether this modification constitutes a development to maturity or to cowardly pragmatism is not for me to say. It might be that, in declining to depend such a great amount on any one companion, I am choosing protection toward oneself over closeness. Then again it might be that, as we progress into middle age, the life issue gets to be less that of securing a tight dyadic bond and more one of going in a more extensive world, "society." Indeed, since Americans have so ill defined an idea of society, we regularly attempt to put fellowship arranges in its place. When I consider the qualities that portray the best fellowships I've known, I can recognize five: affinity, fondness, need, propensity, and absolution. Affinity and friendship can just take you as such; they may abandon you at the formal, external entryway of goodwill, which is still not fellowship. A determined requirement for the other's organization, for their advantage, endorsement, sentiment, will get you inside the doors, particularly when it is responded. At last, on the other hand, there are no substitutes for propensity and pardoning. A kinship may go for quite a long time on comfy propensity. Yet it is a despairing actuality that unless you are an example of piety you are certain to irritate each companion profoundly at any rate once in the process of time. The companions I have kept the longest are the individuals who pardoned me for wronging them, inadvertently, deliberately, or by the plain calamity of my identity, over and over. There can be no companionship without pardoning.
-
How to make a Valid Argument Hello, and welcome to my essay about how to make a valid argument. In this article, you find the essentials that are needed to make your argument valid. It will also justify what is bad, and what is optional. The key elements to a valid argument is determining comparisons and contrasts, showing multiple perspectives of the debate, providing logical reasoning, and citing all possible sources. Determining Comparisons and Contrasts In order for a debate to perform, it needs an organized table of pros and cons, which leads to my second point. A valid argument MUST have more pros then cons, otherwise it is not valid, and these pros and cons must also have logical reasoning and cited sources, otherwise the advantages of these supports will not be valid. The reasoning must not have filler, it needs support that has an advantage over the opposing lead. Showing Multiple Perspectives If your argument has only support from your own self, then obviously, no one will agree with you. It needs to have thoughts from someone who is closer to the crowd, someone who can help you reach your voice out. Also remember to cite other people quotes and speeches if your text includes them. Don't quote not as important stuff, because this applies as "filler". Logical Reasoning Do insert filler into your debate to make the article seem longer, it does not defy as reason for validation. If you are going to convince someone, you have to have evidence to back up your statement logically. This may or may not apply under the circumstances of religion, as for religion may be offended by certain types of logic. Citing Resources If your sources are said to be correct, and your information does not have the same information, your information will be considered bias, and is not exactly valid. Cite address links to each piece of info, this will allow instant proof of your information. Make sure that your information has a variety of sources, or else it just the opinions of a single source being transferred to another. In Conclusion, If your debate follows these guidelines, then there is no margin for error, and your argument is automatically valid. These guidelines do not apply for prior arguments, they are just setting a bar for you to reach in the future. Maybe if someone pinned this, you could always refer back to this when you are lost in making a topic yourself.
