upton889 Posted August 26, 2012 Report Share Posted August 26, 2012 343 owes it to us players who have been playing matchmaking since it's beginning to put in a playlist consisting of classic halo. I'll play almost all of the Halo 4 playlists but it would give the newer players a chance to experience what Halo was in the Halo 2 and 3 days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gundamatrix Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 I must say there is rather a large amount of disregard for halo 3 fans in his thread. People saying "Go play halo 3 we need to move on". How hard can it be to implement a classic playlist? yes we need to make changes but why should i play a game thats 5 years old and has a population of 30,000 just to have that classic gameplay that made me fall in love with the franchise in the first place? Ludicrous, its simple enough. Just turn Armour abilities off. Sorted. I just hope halo 4 does not become reach in the fact that it forgets what game its meant to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ins4nek1ll4 Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 im voting yes, it will make halo 4 more popular with all gamers if they get to choose, yes halo likes to move on but its better to keep your options open Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryu♥Hayabusa Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 I think classic should have flag, ctf, slayer, etc playlists as well, that way, we can have the old times back since some want it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r1kkie Posted August 30, 2012 Report Share Posted August 30, 2012 As long as gamers want to play it why not? If this will mean more people will play H4 longer its a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thompson26 Posted August 31, 2012 Report Share Posted August 31, 2012 Look at the number of players dropped when Halo Reach was introduced. Look how disappointed people were. All these dumb abillities make the noobs on the game look better then they really are. But case and point, Numbers do not lie. I noticed a huge shift in players from Halo to CoD. I mean look how un popular the MLG Halo got! They stopped featuring it as heavily for crying out loud! Anyone who does not notice this is apparently blind. BRING BACK THE COMPETETIVE EDGE 343, RID OF ABILLITIES FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY! Can't you see the disappointment even the MLG players have posed on their faces? HOW IS STARCRAFT BEATING HALO IN THE CIRCUIT? Because Reach may have single handedly killed the HALO SERIES. And you are about to base another game off it? Im sorry but that is THE WORST IDEA I HAVE EVER HEARD. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuko 'Zarhamee Posted August 31, 2012 Report Share Posted August 31, 2012 Look at the number of players dropped when Halo Reach was introduced. Look how disappointed people were. All these dumb abillities make the noobs on the game look better then they really are. But case and point, Numbers do not lie. I noticed a huge shift in players from Halo to CoD. I mean look how un popular the MLG Halo got! They stopped featuring it as heavily for crying out loud! Anyone who does not notice this is apparently blind. BRING BACK THE COMPETETIVE EDGE 343, RID OF ABILLITIES FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY! Can't you see the disappointment even the MLG players have posed on their faces? HOW IS STARCRAFT BEATING HALO IN THE CIRCUIT? Because Reach may have single handedly killed the HALO SERIES. And you are about to base another game off it? Im sorry but that is THE WORST IDEA I HAVE EVER HEARD. From your post, I doubt that you know anything about Halo 4 beyond the fact that armor abilities are included and that it is based off the Reach engine. Armor abilities are balanced better than they were in Reach. I have also heard from people who played it at E3 that it is an amazing game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thompson26 Posted August 31, 2012 Report Share Posted August 31, 2012 From your post, I doubt that you know anything about Halo 4 beyond the fact that armor abilities are included and that it is based off the Reach engine. Armor abilities are balanced better than they were in Reach. I have also heard from people who played it at E3 that it is an amazing game. Do you believe E3 would Show you people who hated the game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Complete Loser Posted August 31, 2012 Report Share Posted August 31, 2012 Halo 4 IMO looks much better then Reach and uses the CEA engine for graphics but kept some old stuff from Reach(weapons, vehicles, armor abilities) and by far would re-imagine the Halo multiplayer, I like the way 343 is going towards it's looking like the old Halo games in some respects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zuko 'Zarhamee Posted August 31, 2012 Report Share Posted August 31, 2012 Do you believe E3 would Show you people who hated the game? I don't understand. This guy uploaded a video to youtube saying that Halo 4 is amazing and could ship that day with no problems. He's a cool dude and that's all I need to hear to know that the game's gonna be great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thompson26 Posted August 31, 2012 Report Share Posted August 31, 2012 I don't understand. This guy uploaded a video to youtube saying that Halo 4 is amazing and could ship that day with no problems. He's a cool dude and that's all I need to hear to know that the game's gonna be great. I hope you are right, but if this game fails....It will be done unless someone wakes up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.