hudaltheturtle Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 I was just realizing that this is after halo 3 so tthey should have the battle rifle. But since Halo Reach came out with the D.M.R instead im just wondering. Reply if u no something i dont. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ks mojo Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 battle rife all the way 4 quick and skill full shots all the way the dmr was just annoying and made the game feel less action packed and that 5ht shot was just a pain Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SINN Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 In my own opinion i liked the BR it was much better skill wise and more fun. The D.M.R was pretty cool but it lacked in many ways it just wasnt fun for me personally i dont know if it was because I wasnt used to it or what. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord-IGB Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 I like the Battle Rifle more but i would like it if BR & DMR(both) is in Halo 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CsDarKnight Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 I'd rather have the BR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wv_Josh_vw Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 get that dmr trash out of the game. br all the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Director Posted June 18, 2011 Report Share Posted June 18, 2011 If 343i is in any way intelligent, they would try to move Halo 4 as close to Halo 3 and as far from Reach as possible, otherwise they are going to be majorly flamed. So much that they might want to abandon Halo as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 It's funny how so many people on this forum dislike Reach's gameplay.. It fills me with hope to see this many people who despite not liking Reach still haven't given up on the series and joins a forum about Halo to express their opinion on where the series should turn.. Halo fans through and through you are.. (BTW the new forum IS coming soon. you're all going to love the new features.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LHJ199 Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 HALO REACH is an embarrassment to Halo and anything game about halo made after halo 3 was an ambarrassment to halo all togethter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 HALO REACH is an embarrassment to Halo and anything game about halo made after halo 3 was an ambarrassment to halo all togethter. Ever played Halo Wars? I for one didn't think an RTS can even be played on a console (I still believe that) but it wasn't that bad.. Reach is ok but it doesn't have that "Halo Style" anymore, we have health and we take fall damage, it really doesn't feel like any of the other Halo games but that doesn't have it an "embarrassment". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say Ons Posted June 19, 2011 Report Share Posted June 19, 2011 BR! This should not be discussed, although i would like the bullet spread gone so we can get long range kills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafter Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 HALO REACH is an embarrassment to Halo and anything game about halo made after halo 3 was an ambarrassment to halo all togethter. Ever played Halo Wars? I for one didn't think an RTS can even be played on a console (I still believe that) but it wasn't that bad.. Reach is ok but it doesn't have that "Halo Style" anymore, we have health and we take fall damage, it really doesn't feel like any of the other Halo games but that doesn't have it an "embarrassment". Agree with Bob, Halo has to move on, it can't be stuck on the same. If it does, why would we by the new game? It?s the same but with better graphics. For Halo to succeed, 343i needs to show they are better then all the rest, check these posts: http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=351 http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=254&start=10 People, who can't buy all games, or want to choose a game to play, should choose Halo for the fact that it has more variety. IF the ideas in the links are to be given life, multiplayer should be smth like this: when you can choose between competitive and cooperative and community and etc, if you choose competitive you should have this options: Classic Halo ODST (Still thinking on the best words) Classic Halo: No ADS, no AA, the normal maps, 8 players top. ODST: ODST=SWAT, but it should have more playlists (including sprint, ADS, see the links) like Team ODST, FFA ODST, it could even have team objectives ODST. (better than COD) (Still thinking on the best words): as the links said, bigger maps, new gametypes, etc. (better than Battlefield) Like this, people would choose Halo as they can change the gametype depending on theyr mood without much effort. Write comments, specially 343i, Rafter Ps: About br and DMR, 343i should left both, there is nothing wrong in having some weapons you don't use much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EW SNIP3DOWN Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 343 industries HAVE to bring back the battle rifle and the ranking system of halo 3 halo reach destroyed the whole halo feeling with the dmr and the ****ty armor abilities. halo 3 was a much faster and skilled game than gaylo reach in reach it takes like 1 year to punch someone and the medals looks much nicer in the epic halo 3. if master chief has a jetpack in the gameplay then halo 4 will suck balls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baykem Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 I love my Battlle Rifle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baykem Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 HALO REACH is an embarrassment to Halo and anything game about halo made after halo 3 was an ambarrassment to halo all togethter. Ever played Halo Wars? I for one didn't think an RTS can even be played on a console (I still believe that) but it wasn't that bad.. Reach is ok but it doesn't have that "Halo Style" anymore, we have health and we take fall damage, it really doesn't feel like any of the other Halo games but that doesn't have it an "embarrassment". Agree with Bob, Halo has to move on, it can't be stuck on the same. If it does, why would we by the new game? It?s the same but with better graphics. For Halo to succeed, 343i needs to show they are better then all the rest, check these posts: http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=351 http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=254&start=10 People, who can't buy all games, or want to choose a game to play, should choose Halo for the fact that it has more variety. IF the ideas in the links are to be given life, multiplayer should be smth like this: when you can choose between competitive and cooperative and community and etc, if you choose competitive you should have this options: Classic Halo ODST (Still thinking on the best words) Classic Halo: No ADS, no AA, the normal maps, 8 players top. ODST: ODST=SWAT, but it should have more playlists (including sprint, ADS, see the links) like Team ODST, FFA ODST, it could even have team objectives ODST. (better than COD) (Still thinking on the best words): as the links said, bigger maps, new gametypes, etc. (better than Battlefield) Like this, people would choose Halo as they can change the gametype depending on theyr mood without much effort. Write comments, specially 343i, Rafter Ps: About br and DMR, 343i should left both, there is nothing wrong in having some weapons you don't use much. What the hell are you talking about the BR and the DMR are used just as much and mor than most weapons, once you realize that he BR/DMR is a much better weapon for a skilled player then it becomes essential to have in game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baykem Posted June 21, 2011 Report Share Posted June 21, 2011 And idk if you heard of this but, im pretty sure bloom came with or embedded into the reach engine, thats why halo 4 is running off a different engine, why else would they sacrifice graphics for a new engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delete_123 Posted June 22, 2011 Report Share Posted June 22, 2011 x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zestyketchup Posted June 22, 2011 Report Share Posted June 22, 2011 HALO REACH is an embarrassment to Halo and anything game about halo made after halo 3 was an ambarrassment to halo all togethter. Ever played Halo Wars? I for one didn't think an RTS can even be played on a console (I still believe that) but it wasn't that bad.. Reach is ok but it doesn't have that "Halo Style" anymore, we have health and we take fall damage, it really doesn't feel like any of the other Halo games but that doesn't have it an "embarrassment". lol I'm confused. Didn't Halo CE have fall damage and health? Just sayin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCobaltOcean Posted June 22, 2011 Report Share Posted June 22, 2011 BR + DMR + MA5B + MA5K- Amen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cesar_wacho1 Posted June 22, 2011 Report Share Posted June 22, 2011 Please return BRs, DMR sucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMCooper20 Posted June 22, 2011 Report Share Posted June 22, 2011 343 industries HAVE to bring back the battle rifle and the ranking system of halo 3 halo reach destroyed the whole halo feeling with the dmr and the ****ty armor abilities. halo 3 was a much faster and skilled game than gaylo reach in reach it takes like 1 year to punch someone and the medals looks much nicer in the epic halo 3. if master chief has a jetpack in the gameplay then halo 4 will suck balls to be honest the halo 3 leveling system was crap cos it took forever to level up and the reach medals looked so much better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ess monsoon Posted June 23, 2011 Report Share Posted June 23, 2011 from what bungie said the dmr,aa's, and some other stuff where prototypes made on reach. when reach was destroyed the dmr, armor abilities, and some other stuff where destroyed when the covenent burned and glassed reach. so i highly doubt the aa's and dmr will return. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauted Smurf Posted June 23, 2011 Report Share Posted June 23, 2011 You should be able to switch the fire mode between burst fire and single shot maybe even fully auto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafter Posted June 23, 2011 Report Share Posted June 23, 2011 quote="LHJ199"]HALO REACH is an embarrassment to Halo and anything game about halo made after halo 3 was an ambarrassment to halo all togethter.[/quote Ever played Halo Wars? I for one didn't think an RTS can even be played on a console (I still believe that) but it wasn't that bad.. Reach is ok but it doesn't have that "Halo Style" anymore, we have health and we take fall damage, it really doesn't feel like any of the other Halo games but that doesn't have it an "embarrassment". Agree with Bob, Halo has to move on, it can't be stuck on the same. If it does, why would we by the new game? It?s the same but with better graphics. For Halo to succeed, 343i needs to show they are better then all the rest, check these posts: http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=351 http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=254&start=10 People, who can't buy all games, or want to choose a game to play, should choose Halo for the fact that it has more variety. IF the ideas in the links are to be given life, multiplayer should be smth like this: when you can choose between competitive and cooperative and community and etc, if you choose competitive you should have this options: Classic Halo ODST (Still thinking on the best words) Classic Halo: No ADS, no AA, the normal maps, 8 players top. ODST: ODST=SWAT, but it should have more playlists (including sprint, ADS, see the links) like Team ODST, FFA ODST, it could even have team objectives ODST. (better than COD) (Still thinking on the best words): as the links said, bigger maps, new gametypes, etc. (better than Battlefield) Like this, people would choose Halo as they can change the gametype depending on theyr mood without much effort. Write comments, specially 343i, Rafter Ps: About br and DMR, 343i should left both, there is nothing wrong in having some weapons you don't use much. What the hell are you talking about the BR and the DMR are used just as much and mor than most weapons, once you realize that he BR/DMR is a much better weapon for a skilled player then it becomes essential to have in game You didnt understand what I was saying. Of course that, in the past Halo games, the BR and the DMR are the weapons most used in the games (even non-skilled players get that); what I was saying is: 343i should put both weapons in Halo 4 even if people only use the br or only use the DMR (it seems that people prefer the first option) and the other is not used much. That's what I am trying to say. Vote here: http://www.343industries.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=452 Rafter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poo1337 Posted June 24, 2011 Report Share Posted June 24, 2011 they should hav both in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.