Havoc Posted April 12, 2012 Report Share Posted April 12, 2012 It absolutely be like Halo 3 or Halo 2. I say that just for the simple 1-50 ranking system. They need to end the grind for exp and ranking up that's in Reach, it makes the game boring! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c16jordan Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 I'd like somthing similar to the Halo 3 system. The Halo 3 system was better than the one in Reach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killy Posted April 13, 2012 Report Share Posted April 13, 2012 if ranks are like reach then il most likely buy the game, but if it goes back to halo 3 ranks then il never buy the game, most people i talk to they like not having to worry about there rank. halo 4 is taking for ever to come out, and halo reach is still mostly played halo, still better then halo 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King of Winter Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 I'm good with anything as long as it shows true skill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaxx Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 But there is more to games than just K/D. What about objective based games? Shouldn't you be awarded for completing the objective? Wins should still be incorporated as well. I could lose every game I play, be the only member of my team with a positive K/D, and still rank up. I use the same argument in reverse, as well. I could be terrible, but the other members of my team are great, and we win a lot, so I rank up even though I did poor. Definitely agree that it should be a mix between 2, 3 & Reach, but finding the right mix is the challenge. The real question though, is what is 343 really thinking about this? I agree, but if u got a good k/d AND did the objective, maybe u could get more exp, that would be a nice boost 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ccup-mann Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 A mix between halo 2 and halo 3, they took skill to rank up, reach just awards playtime Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadlySniper19 Posted April 14, 2012 Report Share Posted April 14, 2012 if ranks are like reach then il most likely buy the game, but if it goes back to halo 3 ranks then il never buy the game, most people i talk to they like not having to worry about there rank. halo 4 is taking for ever to come out, and halo reach is still mostly played halo, still better then halo 3. If you're in favor of a matchmaking system which has no representation of player skill, then why not, in a halo 3 system, just play social while the actual non-casual players can enjoy climbing levels? Why make the competitive community suffer when you can have both ranked for competitive players and social for casuals like you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shookum33 Posted June 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 11, 2012 if ranks are like reach then il most likely buy the game, but if it goes back to halo 3 ranks then il never buy the game, most people i talk to they like not having to worry about there rank. halo 4 is taking for ever to come out, and halo reach is still mostly played halo, still better then halo 3. haha i hope you are trolling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shookum33 Posted June 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 11, 2012 I really dont mind if they have a system like reach as long as they have a separate system that has ranks based on skill. Playing people your skill is more fun then destroying kids or getting idiots on your team every game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.