Jump to content

"Drawn By Fate" Contest Winners!


RedStarRocket91

Recommended Posts

Curses, I thought for sure victory was mine! My plans for forum domination have been foiled again!

 

Way to go, everyone, and congratulations to the winners! It was awesome to see all of the participants break out the paint brushes and canvases and fly at it... or, computer mice and monitors. Same thing, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/1/2014 at 3:46 AM, Mᴀᴇsᴛʀᴏ ᴛʜᴇ Sᴛᴀᴍᴘᴇᴅᴇ said:

Curses, I thought for sure victory was mine! My plans for forum domination have been foiled again!

 

Way to go, everyone, and congratulations to the winners! It was awesome to see all of the participants break out the paint brushes and canvases and fly at it... or, computer mice and monitors. Same thing, right?

Don't be so sure of yourself your artwork will see the light of day again

 

*soon* *wink* *wink*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This calls for a round of applause.  :clap:

                                                 :clap:        :clap:

                                               :clap:            :clap:

                                                  :clap:        :clap:

                                                        :clap:

 

That's kind of round….. :/

Good job to everyone that entered and congrats to Mayh3m and JL!

Can't wait to see these go up on the sites.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

congratulations to Magical Love and Darth Mayh3m for winning they are great cover pictures to use for facebook and things like that :)
commiserations to all those who didn't win but don't worry you will have another chance in the future so don't feel down and maybe you can make an even better piece of art and maybe win the next one :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I'm going to have to break up the chain of congrats posts here by doing a bit of a 'review'. I mean, congrats to Mayh3m and Lucky Me for winning, and good job to everyone (Because yes, you guys DID do a good job), but I felt as though each and every piece have a few issues that could be improved on, which is basically what I'll be iterating on in this next post.

 

Do note, all of this is my opinion, and in this 'review' I'm doing it from a single basis and standpoint - that everybody could have done the same thing. Yes, skill level is different but that is something I'll be ignoring, simply because I can't judge it. Furthermore, I acknowledge that some of the programs are worse than others - for example, older software, or free software, may not render the image as well as paid software. (And if I were to specify, I would say that Mayh3m's software from Adobe rendered images the best) However, I'm still not cutting any slack. 

 

I'm writing this hoping that it'll help everyone fix the issues faced in the future, but not necessarily to praise you about what you did well here. It's constructive criticism, and if you don't like it, that is fine. The only reason I write this post now is because I think constructive criticism will be good support for everyone, including me.

 

The following are done in order of the way they were posted in the submission thread.

 

Edward Kenway Submission #1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

UNSC Spartan-II Submission #1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Mayh3m submission 1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Mayh3m submission 2

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

TDM Submission 1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

TDM Submission 2

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

TDM Submission 3

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

JL's submission

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

UNSC Spartan-II submission 2

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Halo5willbecool's submission

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Mayh3m submission 3

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Sikslik7's submission

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

 

To sum up the basic problems that I think I see, it is that:

 

1. There's a lot of times when people simply copy purely the 'Spartan' or the 'Monitor' or the 'Ship' but doesn't copy it's surroundings. This leaves both a bad looking border around the copy, as well as messes up with the depth cues of the image, which then leaves our brain wondering what the frick we're looking at.

 

2. Balancing the number of objects. On one side of the image, quite a few things in the foreground, on the other side, pure background. Also applies to color and lighting. 

 

3. Rendering. I'm fairly certain that apart from Mayh3m's use of Adobe Photoshop C3, all the rendered images do not look as clean and crisp. 

 

All these come together to basically decrease the professionalism in the images. It is this decreased professionalism that then lowered the worth of using the images as a front cover.

 

 

 

 

Personal evaluation: Next time, use adobe

 

==============

 

Now for some happier stuff, congrats to Mayh3m for his success on the FB page photo, as well as a hefty good-job to everybody who participated. It's nice to see everybody give it a go, and yeah, as Ranger said, surprising (But lucky! :P I've seen firsthand what they can do) that the Art Department, or Insignia, didn't input their own works.

Edited by Magical Love
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/1/2014 at 2:28 PM, Magical Love said:

Okay, I'm going to have to break up the chain of congrats posts here by doing a bit of a 'review'. I mean, congrats to Mayh3m and Lucky Me for winning, and good job to everyone (Because yes, you guys DID do a good job), but I felt as though each and every piece have a few issues that could be improved on, which is basically what I'll be iterating on in this next post.

 

Do note, all of this is my opinion, and in this 'review' I'm doing it from a single basis and standpoint - that everybody could have done the same thing. Yes, skill level is different but that is something I'll be ignoring, simply because I can't judge it. Furthermore, I acknowledge that some of the programs are worse than others - for example, older software, or free software, may not render the image as well as paid software. (And if I were to specify, I would say that Mayh3m's software from Adobe rendered images the best) However, I'm still not cutting any slack. 

 

I'm writing this hoping that it'll help everyone fix the issues faced in the future, but not necessarily to praise you about what you did well here. It's constructive criticism, and if you don't like it, that is fine. The only reason I write this post now is because I think constructive criticism will be good support for everyone, including me.

 

The following are done in order of the way they were posted in the submission thread.

 

Edward Kenway Submission #1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

UNSC Spartan-II Submission #1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Mayh3m submission 1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Mayh3m submission 2

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

TDM Submission 1

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

TDM Submission 2

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

TDM Submission 3

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

JL's submission

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

UNSC Spartan-II submission 2

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Halo5willbecool's submission

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Mayh3m submission 3

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Sikslik7's submission

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

 

 

To sum up the basic problems that I think I see, it is that:

 

1. There's a lot of times when people simply copy purely the 'Spartan' or the 'Monitor' or the 'Ship' but doesn't copy it's surroundings. This leaves both a bad looking border around the copy, as well as messes up with the depth cues of the image, which then leaves our brain wondering what the frick we're looking at.

 

2. Balancing the number of objects. On one side of the image, quite a few things in the foreground, on the other side, pure background. Also applies to color and lighting. 

 

3. Rendering. I'm fairly certain that apart from Mayh3m's use of Adobe Photoshop C3, all the rendered images do not look as clean and crisp. 

 

All these come together to basically decrease the professionalism in the images. It is this decreased professionalism that then lowered the worth of using the images as a front cover.

 

 

 

 

Personal evaluation: Next time, use adobe

 

==============

 

Now for some happier stuff, congrats to Mayh3m for his success on the FB page photo, as well as a hefty good-job to everybody who participated. It's nice to see everybody give it a go, and yeah, as Ranger said, surprising (But lucky! :P I've seen firsthand what they can do) that the Art Department, or Insignia, didn't input their own works.

 

Congrats to you as well! And thank you for the criticism, it helps me understand what I need to improve on. 

 

Everyone who entered, you can all grow and get better from here. I am sure the most famous of writers and musicians didn't become amazing overnight. ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...