Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Court dismissed bring in the dancing lobsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Of Harts Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 (edited) Deserves it he stole is from me ! I paid money for that and he just takes it. His picture is just a desperate Photoshop attempt. How can you steal something that you own? I filed for it in January 2014. You claim to have "bought" it from a company who doesn't even own it on Monday 26th May 2014. Edited May 28, 2014 by JXZAW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 JXZAW Court is dismissed until BZ posts again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helix Amell Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Caboose you also said that you didn't care.Then if so then why are you even bothering? This is like having the common argument with a 3 year old , "Oh no I didn't " "Yes I did." "Wahhh wahh wah!" What's next? The rattle's gonna be the one doing the talking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akali Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 WHO CAN'T READ!!!! The court is dismissed. That means STOP POSTING AND ARGUING!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinreaper Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 ****Suddenly a representative from the Federal trade Committee storms into the court room**** You're honor, I must object to this case in every way shape and form. I have here legal documents and sworn testimony from various Trade officials and Government employees that neither company exists and is NOT a registered business. Allow me to elaborate on something the court needs to hear. Under federal and International trade rules, a company, entity or intellectual gathering CANNOT be run, owned or have any signed legal document or contract if said individual is under the age of 18. All minor property owners, heirs or inheritors must be represented by a third party individual acting on behalf of the minor. Said individual is also the only party whom can legally enter into a signed or verbal contract with any business, entity or subsidiary there-of. Neither party has any valid or legal claim over the property Trademark in question. I would ask the court to negate any further proceedings and allow the Trade Commission to re-open the purchasable equity of the aforementioned Trademark for WOLOLOL. I would also ask the court to order into official judgment, that both parties from this moment forth, be restricted to ever use the WOLOLOL brand or mention it ever again! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Twin that is not true only my company exists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akali Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 ****Suddenly a representative from the Federal trade Committee storms into the court room**** You're honor, I must object to this case in every way shape and form. I have here legal documents and sworn testimony from various Trade officials and Government employees that neither company exists and is NOT a registered business. Allow me to elaborate on something the court needs to hear. Under federal and International trade rules, a company, entity or intellectual gathering CANNOT be run, owned or have any signed legal document or contract if said individual is under the age of 18. All minor property owners, heirs or inheritors must be represented by a third party individual acting on behalf of the minor. Said individual is also the only party whom can legally enter into a signed or verbal contract with any business, entity or subsidiary there-of. Neither party has any valid or legal claim over the property Trademark in question. I would ask the court to negate any further proceedings and allow the Trade Commission to re-open the purchasable equity of the aforementioned Trademark for WOLOLOL. I would also ask the court to order into official judgment, that both parties from this moment forth, be restricted to ever use the WOLOLOL brand or mention it ever again! I am in agreement on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Nein we must wait till the judge gets back.... Then 2 more arguments then... The jury's verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinreaper Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 You cannot buy a company at your age Caboose. You have purgered yourself by stating YOU started it, and that the the photographs of your company ARE YOURS. Business laws forbid the purchase, direct ownership and or running of a company by anyone under the age of 18. Therefore, you have lied under oath. It is impossible that you registered the business and conduct the business. Told you guys I could end it quick. Anyone wanna regret not picking me as their lawyer now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akali Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 He is pretty much saying that since you both aren't 18 yet you can't officially run a business Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 (edited) This is a joke.... We need a verdict or..... Our arguments will never ever end. BZ may I start my second argument ? Edited May 28, 2014 by Caboose the Ace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Of Harts Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 BeckoningZebra1, where are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 JXZAW why don't me and you just share this trademark and end this all ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Composite Armour Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Alright, the Jury must reach a verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Wat no ! I still have my next argument but oh well ! Welcome back everyone for my second argument of the night (UK) So, JXZAW who claims he owns a company still claims he owns WOLOLOL I am here to prove him wrong. 1 I did buy it from Microsoft fair and square I promise you all. He claims he filed for it but WOLOLOLOL only has 2 trademarks the old one MS and the new one Caboose industries limited. I paid money for it he did not. He refuses to accept that and is stealing my rights to WOLOLOLOL from me. 2 His image as proof as a high school and a cheap photo shopped picture unlike mine….. Excuse the logo. My factory and company actually exist, And have actually paid for it unlike JXZAW. 3 You didn't buy it from its respectful owner, how can you purchase a trademark from someone who doesn't own it? So a sound clip = a copyrighted trademark? < from JXZAW. Well JX let me tell you. 1 I did and trademarked it. 2 I purchased all rights to anything WOLOLOL full stop and as said before trademarked it. I own it you don’t; I hope the jury sees this as well. Here is more proof my company exists. Here is my hanging out with my employees in my companies blue division. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a8/Rvb_Blue_Team_Halo_3_Engine.jpg Here is a clip of our old work in progress Company board. http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130625022020/rvb/images/c/c1/Blue_team_organization_chart.png Here is a look at our chocolate making processes http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/03_03/Thorntons1_800x584.jpg Here is a pic of managing to buy WOLOLOL from MS. http://www.plus500findings.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Online-Trading.jpg I have evidence, JXZAW does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Of Harts Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 JXZAW why don't me and you just share this trademark and end this all ? I will be willing to do this. If you do add the trademark at the end, you must say that the trademark is owned by both companies. I will do the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 I am willing to share it with you JXZAW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Of Harts Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 If you, Caboose the Ace would be willing to release all charges then I don't see how that isn't possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unease Peanut Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 I vote that none of you get it and this stupid argument will end! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 I will be if we share it. I drop all charges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Of Harts Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose The Ace Posted May 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 I drop all charges against JX incorporated WOLOL™ is a copyrighted trademark of Caboose Industries limited and JX incorporated © All rights Reserved. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Composite Armour Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 The court doesn't end until the Jury reaches a verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Of Harts Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 Trademark rights are now properties of both companies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts