Anarchy Posted February 19, 2012 Report Share Posted February 19, 2012 Should there??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Biggles Posted February 19, 2012 Report Share Posted February 19, 2012 Lets just get past halo 4 - 6 First, ok? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highplainsdrifter Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 Lets just get past halo 4 - 6 First, ok? hahaha classic. I'd like to see more side story games like Halo Wars, ODST, and Reach for sure. My opinion on Halo 7 is a gray area, I want them to end it proper and clean aka beautiful like i know they will with 6. Going to 7 would only be something i'd like (at the moment) if it wasn't the start of another trilogy because I hate when movies do the same thing (not talking about Star Wars) and won't just end it with dignity. If the story goes to 7 then sign me up, if it goes to 9 i'm not sure i'm feeling so adventurous. The catch is how well Halo 4 campaign turns out story-wise, right now i'm really stoked about it (keep in mind that i was wary of 343 delivering a game worthy of the seventh column, so take this as you will) and if it turns out how i'm rooting for it then going all the way to the end of the story is a go for me. Even if that means going to 9. A little extreme, and it may not have been what you were asking about, but I'll be on this site for 15 years if that's what it means. To me it depends when the story has fully run it's course 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AD-Ewok Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 I voted maybe. It's best to see where 5 and 6 leave off. If it wraps it up nicely, then they shouldn't beat it until it's a joke. In that case they should leave it be to have its special place in Games History. It's like Disney trying to force out a ToyStory 4+ to milk more $ when ToyStory 3 wrapped up everything so nicely to the series.. Lol. Sorry for the lame comparing. Also maybe because it'd be another small chance to get another Halo for PC. If THAT happened I'd be so happy I'd run dancing naked in the street. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Director Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 I want to see my grandkids playing Halo 29. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarchy Posted February 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 I want to see my grandkids playing Halo 29. Lol me too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCPO Mayh3m Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 Well, lets place this in perspective. This may be the last storyline with the "Halo" theme. Yes, you may play as Master Chief again, but I don't expect the game to be called "Halo". I think it will run on a different name to drop the access numbers. But still be in the Halo Universe. Make sense? I want to see my grandkids playing Halo 29. You want to see your grandkids playing? Haha, I think they will be the ones watching you play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 No, there shouldn't. By that point the series will just be a money milking series and nothing more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted February 20, 2012 Report Share Posted February 20, 2012 no lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B1ue D3vi1 Posted February 21, 2012 Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 I like the idea of another Halo after the reclaimer trilogy, but I don't see how 343 would be able to do another campaign. It couldn't be about chief again, and as Halo : Reach proved, nobody wants to play as anyone but him. Also, I think after the Reclaimer trilogy ends, there will be no more big conflicts in the Halo universe that need to be resolved, therefore no more Halo Halo needs to stop at six so it doesn't end up like COD. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anarchy Posted February 21, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 I like the idea of another Halo after the reclaimer trilogy, but I don't see how 343 would be able to do another campaign. It couldn't be about chief again, and as Halo : Reach proved, nobody wants to play as anyone but him. Also, I think after the Reclaimer trilogy ends, there will be no more big conflicts in the Halo universe that need to be resolved, therefore no more Halo Halo needs to stop at six so it doesn't end up like COD. Well, I know this is amost impossible but Bungie could maybe take over... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCPO Mayh3m Posted February 21, 2012 Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 Well, I know this is amost impossible but Bungie could maybe take over... Me no like this... Halo on PS3 (or 4) would make me sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caboose Posted February 21, 2012 Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 i would still buy it but it would not be the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Director Posted February 21, 2012 Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 There are THOUSANDS of ways that the storyline can continue and still be pretty interesting. If they do decide to pick one (as long as it's an interesting one) then I will support them full steam ahead. You want to see your grandkids playing? Haha, I think they will be the ones watching you play. lmao or maybe be playing WITH them xD 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destroyaaa Posted February 21, 2012 Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 Im sure the games going to end in halo 6. Why would they continue to drag out a story with Master Chief? (assuming he probably dies or is unable to fight anymore) They could have ended halo with halo 3, I think 6 is enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4sT3r Ch13f S117 Posted February 21, 2012 Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 I want to see my grandkids playing Halo 29. Ya me too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZB-85 Posted February 22, 2012 Report Share Posted February 22, 2012 Yes, without a single thought about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quantum Posted February 22, 2012 Report Share Posted February 22, 2012 I voted for yes without a thought for an 11th game, not a Halo 7. I want to see another prequel/side story game, like Halo: Reach - With an okay campaign, but massive multiplayer capability. I would enjoy that game as much as Reach... Well, more. It's graphics and gameplay would be better, it would be on a better console (it'll be like, 15 years? In the future?), and it should just be all around better. I say yes to another game. Not Halo 7. The storyline is good enough for 6 games, but it will NOT need another afterwards. 2 trilogies is good enough for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recon Posted February 22, 2012 Report Share Posted February 22, 2012 Is it possible for there to be a cliffhanger ending that 343 won't tell? and then they'll leave the legacy of halo to another company? find out next time on, Lets just end a 9001, cause multiplayer- Is fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exploseth Posted February 22, 2012 Report Share Posted February 22, 2012 The Halo trilogy will never die most likely as long as there's Halo fans there will be Halo. I say that because even if 343 stops at Halo 6, some other company or fans will continue the Trilogy. The storyline of John might end at Halo 6 but there will always be Halo, even if the Xbox 360 gets outdated and there is a new kind of Console. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperIntendant Posted February 23, 2012 Report Share Posted February 23, 2012 I'm going to say, holy mother of god please no. If they make a Halo 7 the series will be reduced to what Call of Duty is. I mean think about it, that would be 10 games including spin offs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haloboy Posted February 23, 2012 Report Share Posted February 23, 2012 I dont wanna see Halo get milked. Halo is an unique so I want it to end after Halo 6 but time will tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SangMan Posted March 6, 2012 Report Share Posted March 6, 2012 Halo 7 needs to be made by Bungie. Because they love 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gone Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 It's too early to tell. Honestly, when they said they would be releasing 4-6, I kind of feel like they're milking the franchise. If they keep coming up with new things and being innovative, sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
36-2071 Pragmatic Avarice Posted March 10, 2012 Report Share Posted March 10, 2012 Halo seven would be the start of the Inheritor trilogy? XD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.