Jump to content

join in progress is Bungies idea not activision's


Ninja Wolf

Recommended Posts

so everyone thinks that joining in games over xbox live was Activision's idea? well ill let everyone know that no it's not their idea..its bungies.that idea was in Halo 2.& ever since activision came along they been stealing other game developers idea's and claiming it as there's...just look at the golden guns thats in cod...you think that that's Activisions idea? well thats when your wrong...Golden guns was first introduced in Goldeneye 007 for the n64 back in the 90's by a game company called RARWARE..they were the 1n's that made that idea up in a FPS...and now they cant even make another goldeneye because activision has the IP to goldeneye which i dont know how they got the rights to it...but only GOD knows why..now back to the subject about joining in progress games over xbox live was Bungies idea..and not activision's idea..here's the story behind joining in progress games for xbox live multiplayer---> http://www.343industries.org/forum/forum/54-halo/ I hope this helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... WHAT.

 

 

Why would anyone think Activision came up with the idea with join-in-progress feature? Join-in-progress has been in most multiplayer games since the 90's.

 

Acitvision didn't invent it, neither did Bungie. This should be common knowledge.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

... WHAT.

 

 

Why would anyone think Activision came up with the idea with join-in-progress feature? Join-in-progress has been in most multiplayer games since the 90's.

 

Acitvision didn't invent it, neither did Bungie. This should be common knowledge.

 

Because many cod players are idiots and think so... then they say how COD creates so many ideas

 

call+of+duty+players+_ba4a087c685b6ce740639e0334e28777.gif My COD Freinds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Activson is essentially the bully in this gaming industry. They take what they don't deserve and make money off of want isn't necessarily good. They play a lot of mind games on the gaming community too. Just disregard everything good you hear about them, because they are TRULY in it JUST for the money.

 

If they cared about customer satisfaction, would they really release a Call of Duty game anually? Releasing game sequels at that kind of rate just shows how much they care about improvement. In other words, they don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the difference microsoft 343 and activision is that where 343 care about a great storyline and a game to last us years, activision only need months before hype builds for a new game in less then a year. Microsoft = quality Activision = love of money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...